MindMap Gallery [Reading Notes] A Brief History of Humanity, A Brief History of the Future, A Brief History of Today
Suppose we travel back to Europe 100,000 years ago, and you will find that there are actually two types of humans living on that land, one is our ancient ancestor Homo sapiens, and the other is Neanderthals.
Edited at 2022-10-27 23:58:56One Hundred Years of Solitude is the masterpiece of Gabriel Garcia Marquez. Reading this book begins with making sense of the characters' relationships, which are centered on the Buendía family and tells the story of the family's prosperity and decline, internal relationships and political struggles, self-mixing and rebirth over the course of a hundred years.
One Hundred Years of Solitude is the masterpiece of Gabriel Garcia Marquez. Reading this book begins with making sense of the characters' relationships, which are centered on the Buendía family and tells the story of the family's prosperity and decline, internal relationships and political struggles, self-mixing and rebirth over the course of a hundred years.
Project management is the process of applying specialized knowledge, skills, tools, and methods to project activities so that the project can achieve or exceed the set needs and expectations within the constraints of limited resources. This diagram provides a comprehensive overview of the 8 components of the project management process and can be used as a generic template for direct application.
One Hundred Years of Solitude is the masterpiece of Gabriel Garcia Marquez. Reading this book begins with making sense of the characters' relationships, which are centered on the Buendía family and tells the story of the family's prosperity and decline, internal relationships and political struggles, self-mixing and rebirth over the course of a hundred years.
One Hundred Years of Solitude is the masterpiece of Gabriel Garcia Marquez. Reading this book begins with making sense of the characters' relationships, which are centered on the Buendía family and tells the story of the family's prosperity and decline, internal relationships and political struggles, self-mixing and rebirth over the course of a hundred years.
Project management is the process of applying specialized knowledge, skills, tools, and methods to project activities so that the project can achieve or exceed the set needs and expectations within the constraints of limited resources. This diagram provides a comprehensive overview of the 8 components of the project management process and can be used as a generic template for direct application.
[Reading Notes] "A Brief History of Humanity" & "A Brief History of the Future" & "A Brief History of Today"
📝"A Brief History of Today" | Interpretation by Duan Wenqiang
Mind map of the whole book
Part One: Work
Harari believes that the rise of artificial intelligence will cause large-scale unemployment in human society, and this unemployment is very different from the unemployment that occurred in the past. It will turn most people into "useless people."
We still have to start with Trump. Trump told Americans a story that foreign immigrants are taking away American job opportunities and various social benefits, so immigration should be restricted or even some immigrants should be kicked out. Many Americans believed the story and became xenophobic.
But Harari believes that Americans have been misled by Trump, because in more than ten years, or at most decades, both Americans and non-Americans will face a situation, which is widespread unemployment. Human jobs will be replaced by artificial intelligence. Speaking of which, everyone is familiar with this topic. There are too many scholars and experts discussing this topic. But in Harari’s view, most discussions are overly optimistic.
There are two main reasons for optimism.
The first is that many fields that face specific problems, such as maintenance, doctors, lawyers, design, programming, etc., are likely to be replaced by artificial intelligence, while those that require creativity, such as art, literature, business, etc. , which is an area that artificial intelligence cannot reach.
But the actual situation may not be like this. Today's artificial intelligence can already write and create very advanced lyrics and music. It can even create new works that are fake and real based on the finished products of some people. For example, through extensive analysis of Bach's music, Compose a new work in the same style.
Harari said that we actually have a deep misunderstanding of creative behavior. Take Go as an example. Whether it is AlphaGo or the upgraded version of AlphaGo Zero, in the process of competing with humans, they can often beat human players. There are ways that we cannot think of or even understand. This is because the human brain actually has a flaw in terms of creativity. It is difficult for us to imagine things we have never seen before. For example, before Steve Jobs designed the iPhone, no one could imagine that a mobile phone could be designed like this. After the iPhone, everyone began to imitate it, but no one could imagine what the next generation of mobile phones would look like. They could only wait for the next Steve Jobs to appear. . But artificial intelligence has no such limitations. Set a goal for it, such as winning this game of chess, or designing a better mobile phone than the iPhone. As long as the data and algorithms of artificial intelligence are powerful enough, it can "think" They come up with many ways to achieve goals that humans cannot imagine. This kind of creativity is actually much more powerful than humans.
The second reason for optimism about artificial intelligence is that this artificial intelligence revolution, like many revolutions in the past, will replace many jobs, but it will also create many new jobs.
For example, every time the United States sends out a drone, it requires thirty people to operate it behind the scenes. The United States once fell into a situation where there were enough drones but no one to operate it behind the scenes. Indeed, the artificial intelligence revolution will definitely create many new jobs, but the problem is that in 1920, people who lost their jobs due to agricultural mechanization could go to tractor factories to assemble, but after more than ten years, those who were replaced by artificial intelligence The replaced drivers and cashiers cannot become the behind-the-scenes operation and maintenance personnel of the drones just mentioned.
In other words, most of the jobs replaced by the artificial intelligence revolution are basic jobs, while most of the new jobs created are high-end jobs. There is an insurmountable gap between the two.
You see, the emergence of artificial intelligence will make our work and life completely different. Human jobs will inevitably be replaced by artificial intelligence on a large scale, and the people who are replaced will enjoy the dividends brought by artificial intelligence and basically have no worries about food and clothing. However, these people cannot truly integrate into the era of artificial intelligence, thus becoming Useless people are marginalized by society and the times.
Harari said, don’t think that you will not be replaced by artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence does not have to be perfect. It can replace you as long as it does better than you. This is the dramatic change that has taken place in the world of work after adding information technology as a variable.
Part Two: Education
Regarding education, Harari believes that the current education model is failing and we need to establish a new education system.
The traditional education model is slowly losing its effectiveness
Why do you say that? I believe that all users who use the Get App to listen to this audio episode have only experienced one education model in the past few decades, which is continuous and hierarchical exam-oriented education. Everyone started when they were two or three years old. Go to kindergarten, then go through elementary school, middle school, high school, college, and possibly a master's and PhD.
People in the past concentrated on studying for more than 20 years in life, and there were only two purposes of studying. Before college, it was to go to college, and after college, it was to learn a major. This is the same whether in China or abroad, except that China may pay more attention to exams.
This education model has an implicit premise, that is, if a person spends more than two decades studying intensively, the learning results obtained can basically be applied to the rest of his life.
But Harari said this education model may be becoming outdated.
The future is segmented lifelong learning
As we said in the first part, in the future, artificial intelligence will replace human jobs on a large scale, but this replacement will not happen in an instant, it will be a step-by-step process.
For example, in ten years, artificial intelligence may achieve breakthroughs in the field of driving and replace most drivers.
In another ten years, artificial intelligence may make a breakthrough in the field of programming and replace most programmers
In another ten years, it may be doctors or lawyers who will be replaced.
In other words, the past model of clearly separating study time and work time is definitely no longer applicable. It is possible that most people will face a situation of being constantly replaced and learning again in the future. Harari said in the book that major changes in the future are likely to change the basic framework of life, making discontinuity the most prominent feature. In other words, people in the future may leave school at the age of twenty, work for ten years, and then enter school again at the age of thirty, and so on. This is a discontinuous life.
After understanding this, Harari further pointed out that now we simply do not know how to deal with this situation. Whether it is exam-oriented education or so-called quality education, they are essentially education models in a segmented life. There is no difference in nature. How should this future, discontinuous, and lifelong learning education model be constructed? and unfolding, no one knows yet, and only a few people and companies are trying. In other words, our life is no longer centralized learning, but segmented lifelong learning. This is the educational problem we have to face in the era of information technology.
Part Three: Freedom
Harari said that artificial intelligence will pose a threat to everyone's freedom.
Over the past hundred years, freedom has been a universal spiritual pursuit
At the level of freedom, people pursue their own independence and true feelings. The most typical example is what has happened in the UK in recent years.
We all know that the UK held two referendums in 2014 and 2016. The former almost split the island of Great Britain into two parts, while the latter directly determined the outcome of the UK's imminent departure from the EU. The reason why the UK uses referendums to decide national decisions at this level is because it believes in and respects everyone's free choice and believes that everyone's choices are rational.
But Harari’s comment is that all referendums and elections always appeal to human feelings, not human reason. But whether it is reason or feeling, liberalism is against authority, that is, I have to choose what I want to do, rather than what I am assigned to do.
For example, free love means free choice, and parental orders are arrangements from authority. Based on the experience of the past hundred years or so, it seems that mankind will continue to pursue freedom. The UK is likely to face countless Scottish referendums until Scotland and England are completely separated. However, when artificial intelligence appears, the situation will It was starting to get a little awkward.
Artificial Intelligence is best at using data to make choices
Compared with humans, the power of artificial intelligence lies in the collection, processing and analysis of information. These abilities will eventually evolve into powerful decision-making capabilities. And when the decision-making power of artificial intelligence exceeds that of humans in some fields, if you listen to artificial intelligence, it is another kind of obedience to authority. If you don’t listen to artificial intelligence, the possibility of making mistakes in decision-making will be very high. , when such scenes gradually cover more and more social fields, new social authorities emerge.
When all this happens, the most common scenario may be that artificial intelligence will tell you who is your best partner and what kind of major and job is best for you, even though you don't like this person in terms of feelings. You don’t like the job, but you know it’s probably right. What should you do? Should you believe in yourself or obey artificial intelligence? If you believe in yourself, you are likely to go astray, but if you believe in artificial intelligence, you will lose your freedom.
Therefore, after the rise of artificial intelligence, we may fall into a new authoritative or even authoritarian society. What’s even more frightening is that the authoritative society of artificial intelligence will be much more reasonable than the previous authoritative society dominated by humans. You may have no reason to fight against this authoritative society. In other words, on the issue of freedom, if we cannot handle the relationship between humans and artificial intelligence, we may become puppets on strings in the future.
Part 4: Equality
On the issue of equality, Harari believes that in the era of information technology, the entire society will become more and more unequal. It is not just a matter of polarization, but the entire society may be torn apart. Next, let’s take a look at why Harari thinks so.
The opposition between equality and freedom
Although we often talk about equality and freedom together, as if they are the same thing, Harari said in "A Brief History of Humanity" that equality and freedom are not only not the same thing, but are even opposed to a certain extent. Because the core of freedom is to keep each person as independent and unique as possible, while the core of equality is just the opposite. What it wants to ensure is consistency between people, and at least the same rights and opportunities.
Therefore, if you want to ensure equality, you must restrict those who are more prominent; if you want everyone to be free, you will inevitably affect the equality of everyone.
The most typical example is in the United States. Democrats want society to be more equal, and they will not hesitate to raise taxes to help the elderly, the weak, the sick, and the disabled, but this will inevitably affect people’s financial freedom; while Republicans want everyone to enjoy The greatest freedom, even if the gap between rich and poor is widened, will not hesitate, but in this case, equality will be impossible to talk about.
Equality and freedom are both right
However, although there is a contradiction between equality and freedom, it does not mean that they are right or wrong. They are both right. Therefore, we can see that over the past hundred years, equality has become as important as freedom. achieved rapid development.
For example, more than half a century ago, Martin Luther King still had to speak out for the basic rights of black people, and half a century later, a black man actually became the president of the United States.
According to this logic, human society will become more and more equal, and the world will gradually become homogeneous and unified. However, this is not the actual situation. While information technology is shaking the foundation of freedom, it is also impacting equality.
Information technology has three levels of impact on equality
The first level is the Internet
We all know that the development speed of the Internet is amazing, but at the same time, the wealth accumulation effect of the Internet is also amazing.
With the help of smartphones, Apple defeated Nokia, the old mobile phone empire, within a few years. It only took Amazon more than 20 years to become the world's top company with a market value of nearly one trillion. This process will continue with the development of information technology. accelerate.
Harari said in the book that the wealth owned by the 100 richest people in the world has exceeded that of the poorest 4 billion people.
The second level of impact comes from artificial intelligence
This is relatively simple. We have said before that after the rise of artificial intelligence, a large number of people will become useless. Compared with those who can integrate artificial intelligence, the social status, wealth and power of these people will be significantly reduced.
The third level of impact is big data
As we all know, we have entered an era of big data, and those who get data will win the world.
Data in the 21st century has become the most important social resource, just like oil in the 20th century and electricity in the 19th century. But unlike other resources, data is destined to only be in the hands of a few people and companies, because even if ordinary people and ordinary companies can get the data, they have no way to store it or use it.
In other words, in the past we thought that information technology would make human society more and more equal by connecting everyone and eliminating information barriers. We were wrong. Information technology has not only failed to eliminate inequality, it has also accelerated the process. If we cannot find a way to deal with it, society may be torn apart.
Part Five: Terrorism
Harari wrote in the book that terrorism is purely a panic amplified by information technology. Before the information age, terrorism did not exist, but in the information age, the actual threat of terrorism is far greater than its potential threat. Let’s see how this conclusion comes about.
Terrorism has a purpose
Anyone who has flown before knows that today's boarding procedures are very complicated. It may take an hour or two from applying for a boarding pass to boarding the plane, and you have to go through at least two very strict security checks along the way. We are accustomed to this situation now, but in fact, more than ten years ago, flying did not have to be so troublesome. You basically took your electronic ticket, scanned your luggage, and then boarded the plane. About twenty minutes. So when did the boarding process become complicated? It was after terrorism spread around the world. The specific time was September 11, 2001, that is, after the 9.11 incident. In other words, the main reason why airports tighten security checks is terrorism.
When you mention terrorism, you will immediately think of words such as blood, cruelty, violence, etc., and then you will also think of many famous terrorist incidents, such as 9·11 and the Charlie Hebdo incident. In the general impression, terrorist organizations are those organizations that are enemies of human civilization and have extreme violent tendencies. Their purpose is to retaliate and cause killing, so they use methods such as suicide bombs to attack civilians. But Harari said that our overall impression of terrorism is wrong. Although it is true that a small part of terrorism is for pure killing, most terrorism has a clear political purpose and they want to change politics to a certain extent. situation. To put it simply, the ultimate goal of those terrorists targeting the United States is to subvert the U.S. government.
Terrorism uses the Internet to create panic
Since they are targeting the government, why do they always target civilians?
The reason is very simple. Most terrorist organizations are very weak and cannot confront a country's government, let alone launch a direct war. Therefore, they use current information technology to create one "big drama" after another. .
The book writes that terrorist acts actually cause very few casualties. Taking the United States as an example, since 2001, the average number of people killed in terrorist acts in the United States every year is ten, while the number of people killed in car accidents is 40,000. In other words, the actual harm of terrorism is far less than that of a car accident.
But the paradox is that Americans are far more afraid of terrorism than car accidents, and this is exactly the effect that terrorists want. The purpose of terrorists is not to cause real killings, but to use information technology to create panic. Therefore, terrorists' methods are very cruel and only target civilians.
What they want is visual and psychological impact. A vicious incident can spread all over the world within a few hours, causing most people to panic. Once the masses panic, the government has to step in to quell the panic. Therefore, the United States spends a lot of manpower and material resources to fight against terrorist organizations. As a result, the entire world begins to become turbulent.
Harari has a good metaphor for this: a terrorist is like a fly that wants to destroy a china shop, but it doesn't have that much power, so it gets into the bull's ear, makes the bull crazy, and then Rush into the china shop.
Dealing with terrorism
This is the truth about terrorism. It can be said that without the Internet and information technology, terrorism would not be able to develop at all. So far, we do not have the best strategy to deal with terrorism, because it is rooted in information technology and then creates unlimited panic. We can neither cut off information technology nor completely contain panic, so we can only strengthen it through Security checks reduce the occurrence of terrorist incidents. But doing so would not only cost too much, but also achieve little.
Perhaps the only way to deal with terrorism is to let everyone correctly understand that terrorism is not that terrible.
Part Six: War
In Harari's view, although most areas are now peaceful, and this peace has lasted for a long time, humans still cannot eliminate war, and future wars will be more terrifying than in the past. Let’s take a look at what is so scary about future wars.
Wars are generally on the decline
To some extent, the reason why people today are extremely panicked about terrorism is not only the main reason of information technology, but also related to long-term peace.
Since the end of World War II, except for some areas, most people in the world have not seen or felt war for a long time. War has indeed been on the decline over the past nearly eighty years, and the famous psychologist Stephen Pinker wrote a famous book about it called "The Better Angels of Our Nature." He believes that the decrease in violence in the past few decades is due to changes in human nature, with fewer elements of violence and more and more kindness.
But Harari believes that the reason for the decrease in wars is not that human nature is getting better and better, but that the nature of wars is changing.
The nature of war changes
In the past, humans frequently launched wars because wars were profitable and huge profits.
In the agricultural era, the most basic production resources were land and population, so various empires in history liked to occupy land and plunder populations through war.
The most typical examples are the United States and Russia. The Americans began their westward movement in the 18th century, expanding their territory from the Atlantic coast to the Pacific. Russia began to expand eastward from what is now Moscow to the Bering Strait. Both countries gained a large amount of territory and wealth.
In the industrial era, the value of people and land was declining, and various natural resources became important.
Therefore, in World War I, Germany's main war goal was not to occupy France, but to reorganize the colonies.
In other words, minerals and oil are the main war objectives of this era.
However, in the era of information technology, war seems to have lost its role.
Harari gave an example. If an army occupied Silicon Valley, they would get almost nothing except destroying the prosperity of Silicon Valley, because Silicon Valley only has technology and no silicon mines.
The same is true for Wall Street and Zhongguancun. There is no benefit in occupying these places. In other words, war is no longer profitable for various countries.
Since there is no profit to be gained, why start a war? This is the real reason for the decline in war.
We must still be wary of war
However, despite this, Harari still reminds us to be wary of war. The reason is simple. Although war is unprofitable for most countries, for a small number of people, war still has great appeal.
For example, terrorism hopes that wars will break out between various countries so that they have the opportunity to change the political landscape, just like ISIS. Moreover, although terrorist organizations are not rivals of other countries in terms of military strength, it is entirely possible for them to gain an advantage in information warfare.
Just imagine, if a terrorist organization invades the U.S. nuclear bomb system and causes the nuclear bomb to explode on the spot or launch it at other countries, World War III may break out. In other words, information technology allows current wars to mainly take place in areas where there is no smoke of gunpowder, but there is still the possibility of large-scale wars in the future.
Harari believes that we cannot relax our vigilance against war just because of the nearly eighty years of peace, and that the nature of war is changing. The process of war may occur in areas that we cannot see, and the result will be the annihilation of human society. disaster. This is Harari’s view on the issue of war.
Summarize
A total of six areas of reality were discussed, namely work, education, freedom, equality, terrorism and war.
Of course, this does not mean that this book only discusses these fields. In addition to these six, Harari also wrote about many other fields, such as politics, online communities, religion, etc., but the basic idea is the same as what we just said It’s almost the same, but new variables are constantly emerging. In this case, we need to rethink these areas that we are already familiar with.
As we said before, after the introduction of information technology, almost all the problems we take for granted will undergo fundamental changes, and in the face of these changes, we are basically unprepared to deal with them. Moreover, it is not just information technology that can cause new problems, but also many other super variables, such as biotechnology.
Many of the issues we discussed earlier will become different after adding biotechnology. For example, on the issue of social equality, information technology has accelerated the differentiation of rich and poor in society, while biotechnology will further widen inequality. Those with enough wealth can enjoy the various benefits brought by biotechnology. For example, by modifying genes and even greatly slowing down aging, human society will no longer be divided into rich and poor, but into gods and mortals.
The greatest value of this "A Brief History of Today" is not to propose new explanations and theories about human society, but to allow us to see and think about the reality and future that we have never thought of before, and to be aware of the changes and crises that are taking place.
📝"A Brief History of Today" | Knowledge Conference 003
01 Shared stories are the source of human strength
What is a company? The company is not any specific physical object, but our common imagination
Yuval Harari asks us, what is a company?
Can you find anything that is the entity of the company?
Are you saying that a company is not just its products? No, I changed my product and industry, but it’s still the same company
Is the company the money on its account? You can spend all your money, but this company is still here.
Is it its building? It can be relocated; it’s still this company.
Is it its entire staff and board of directors? All these people can be replaced by this company.
What is the company?
The answer is that the company is nothing. It does not have any specific carrier or body. It is, please note the following judgment, it is our common imagination.
"Shared imagination" will give you a new perspective on the world
As long as we think this company exists, and we know it is a company, then it exists. What a novel experience this was, which is why I jumped up at the time. Those companies were producing products every day, issuing press releases every day, and the two companies were even at war, and they could still recruit employees. It turned out that they did not exist. What a novel realization this is.
You might say what’s so great about this, it wouldn’t exist if it didn’t exist. No, when a company is just our common imagination, if you recognize this, we actually gain a new perspective on the world. Many things are different.
"Shared imagination" is the cornerstone of human relationships
I remember a friend of mine who was a designer and he was very confident in his aesthetic. One day, he came to our house as a guest. During the chat, he brought up a topic, saying that children nowadays love to watch "Peppa Pig" every day. Does the painting of that thing meet the high-end aesthetics? A pig is drawn to look like a hairdryer.
I will never let our children watch "Peppa Pig." After I heard this, I said, I advise you to let your children watch it, regardless of whether it suits your aesthetic taste or not.
Why? Because he is the common story and common imagination of this generation of children. When your child goes to kindergarten, your child can't get in the middle of a conversation about "Peppa Pig". What's his mentality? #notes
Shared stories are the fundamental source of human strength.
Let me give you another example. A friend of mine has just been admitted to a prestigious school in the United States and is going to study in the United States soon. But now that there is nothing going on during the summer vacation, he asked one of his teachers, what preparations should I make for my future life in the United States?
The teacher said, let's do this. Let me give you this suggestion. You should study the big states in the United States and see what states there are and where they are. But that’s not important. What’s important is that you match the celebrities, heroes, famous songs, famous movies, and famous folklore in American history with these states one by one, and then write them down as much as possible. #notes
He said what's the use? It is very useful. You go to a prestigious school in the United States and you have classmates from all states in the United States. When you meet any classmate and find out which state he is from, you will immediately have a conversation with him. This is the first step in your life in the United States. A stepping stone, it is more useful than any knowledge in your head.
In the past, we often said that knowledge is power, but many people do not recognize this sentence. They think that reading is a leisurely thing, just flip through it, and don’t delay making money. Such people actually do not understand what knowledge is power. .
Do you think only scientific and technological knowledge is power? No, knowledge may not be the truth, and it may not even be a tool that can be used right away! As long as this knowledge is shared imagination, it is power.
"Shared imagination" is one reason why Homo sapiens prevails among all species
Why? Because a person's power does not depend on how strong he is, but on how capable he is of mobilizing the cooperation of strangers. What is easiest to mobilize cooperation is, of course, the imagination that we all agree on. In the book "A Brief History of Humankind", Yuval Harari also opened up a particularly big imagination for us.
Suppose we travel back to Europe 100,000 years ago, and you will find that there are actually two types of humans living on that land, one is our ancient ancestor Homo sapiens, and the other is Neanderthals. If you look at these two human species 100,000 years ago, Neanderthals will win by a large margin. They are tall, powerful, and cold-resistant. But why didn’t Neanderthals survive, but Homo sapiens did? Yuval Harari has such a speculation, saying that it is probably like this:
Our ancient ancestors of Homo sapiens had an ability that Neanderthals never had, and that was the ability to talk nonsense.
For example, if faced with the same forest, Neanderthals would say to go into the forest to hunt rabbits. You see how simple and pragmatic they are.
But our ancestors like Homo sapiens would say, let’s go to the forest to find fairies. Do you think this is nonsense? There can’t be fairies in the forest.
“Shared imagination” can unite large-scale human collaboration
But please note that the scale of human collaboration behind these two sentences is different. How many Neanderthals are willing to go to the forest to catch rabbits together at this moment? How large a scale of collaboration can be organized? But it is said that there are fairies in this forest, and once our ancestors of Homo sapiens created this imagination and story and spread it from ten to ten, it would become the common imagination of many people.
With so many people around the world, don’t we still believe that at the end of December, there is an old man who goes around giving gifts to children all over the country and all over the world at Christmas? Don’t we all believe this story? When a story spreads from one person to another, the scale of human collaboration it can unite will be much larger.
So what's the result? Where are the Neanderthals today? It has turned into a fossil. And the descendants of our ancestors of Homo sapiens can watch TV and hold press conferences here today.
Some people sneer at all the achievements of human civilization, calling them nonsense and superstition. No, all the achievements of civilization are worth looking at from this perspective. As long as it is a story that we all agree on, it is a source of strength.
02 Freedom and Equality | The Disintegration of the Common Story of Humanity
The story of this era
"A Brief History of Today" tells us that the common story we face is changing. This change is a turning point for human civilization of our generation.
What is the story shared by our generation of humanity? In fact, when it comes to the fundamentals, there are two words: one is freedom and the other is equality.
You can imagine that if we go back three to four hundred years, no civilized person in the world will think that freedom and equality are natural. Freedom and equality are the two most basic stories of our modern human civilization.
But Yuval Harari tells us that there may be something wrong with these two stories. But please note that this time it is not other people who deprive humans of freedom and equality, but technological power.
In the future, we will rely on artificial intelligence to make decisions for us
Let's look at freedom first. Let's imagine a scenario. Assume that the day when artificial intelligence is particularly developed will actually be realized in a few years.
One day your artificial intelligence doctor tells you that based on my current judgment of your physical condition, your current condition is very worrying. I have calculated now that you should take this medicine. Then a pill pops out of a small mouth. Do you want to take it or not?
You said I don’t feel anything. I’m in good health. The artificial intelligence doctor is very nice and explains to you very politely, yes, you don’t feel it now, but this is what I have learned from you through the big data of billions of people around the world. Tens of thousands of sensors have calculated that you are indeed sick. The medical principles behind my medicine are supported by 10 million pages of medical documents. Please take it now. If you really want to check it, the original data is here, you can check it yourself. You can't check it. What should I do with such huge data? You just have to eat.
Well, please note that even if artificial intelligence does not turn into a terrifying monster to counterattack humans, it is diligently serving us and is our tool. We pay for their services and we are their masters. But think about it, when technology has developed to that level and you follow other people's arrangements for something you don't understand, do you think you still have freedom?
In the future, artificial intelligence may take away human decision-making freedom
Artificial intelligence helps you with marriage matching?
Let's imagine another scenario. One day your artificial intelligence assistant tells you that based on my census in the global population database, you should marry that guy or that girl. Because according to my calculations, after you get married, your personalities will be the best matched and you will have the greatest probability of being happy after marriage. Your babies are most likely to be healthy. Do you want to go find the boy and girl it talks about? You said I don’t want it. All right.
What should you do if you marry someone else and are unhappy after marriage? What if your baby is not as healthy as you expected? Do you have any regrets or fears in your heart? Do you have the ability to bear the consequences of not following the robot's suggestions and choices?
So if you listen, do you think we humans still have freedom?
Robots are totally for your benefit. It is serving us sincerely in accordance with our direction of advancing technology. But freedom is like a bubble, leaving us. This is the first story we believe.
In the future, individual economic capabilities can be converted into the social competitiveness of future generations by purchasing technology.
There is another story called equality. Yes, we all believe that everyone is equal and that everyone is born equal.
Okay, let’s imagine a technological future scenario. Your artificial intelligence servant has developed an ability that allows people to gradually and deeply transform their bodies. Like me, I am definitely the first to buy weight loss services, and some people may choose to make themselves more beautiful and taller. However, as this technology advances, some people will buy the kind of service that makes them smarter, has stronger memory, and can concentrate in a short period of time. All of us here know what a terrible flaw it is to be unable to concentrate in a short period of time, and robots can help you do it.
But don’t forget, all these services may be expensive and only a few people can afford them at first. What does this mean? It means that a person's economic ability can be directly converted into his social competitiveness through this technology. Thinking further, a family's economic ability can be converted into the social competitiveness of the family's descendants through this technology.
In the future, human equality will be shaken by biotechnology
Thinking of this, I know you already understand that this is something that has never happened before in human history. In the past, the reason why we believed in equality was because time has a power. No matter how rich and powerful you are now, time will level you.
The emperor's son may be a fool, and the rich man's son may be a prodigal. There is a saying that if you don't bring it with you in life, you won't take it with you in death. This refers to your wealth.
But if there is such a technological bridge that allows your wealth advantage to be passed on across generations, the most basic foundation of human equality will be shaken. And we think, if that time comes, will the World Cup, the Olympics, and the Nobel Prize still have any meaning? You just spent money to have an operation on yourself, and then what’s the big deal about winning an award?
After material is no longer scarce, what we lack is meaning
The reason why we think these awards are great is because we think everyone is an equal person. Some people rely on their own efforts and talents, and then they stand on the podium and win, so we think he is very charming. We cheered him on. If all these competitions become a venue for people to transform themselves, turn themselves into products, and then go out to experiment, is a competition without charm still a competition? Is a victory without cheers still a victory? All the rituals of our civilization collapsed.
There is another layer. Yuval Harari reminds us here that when the artificial intelligence technology and biotechnology we just talked about, when they are combined, they will give birth to an unprecedented prosperity for human civilization. It will really be great at that time. We will have food to eat, clothing to wear, lack of material things, and be completely away from human beings.
The embarrassment of the future is not that life cannot continue, but that even the value of being enslaved and exploited has disappeared.
Don't you think this is good? People cannot live without meaning. So on the one hand, Yuval Harari tells us good news. In the future, human beings will be extremely prosperous and will have no material scarcity. On the other hand, he tells us great bad news. In the future, some people will be busy doing useful things every day. Meaningful things are exhausting to death, but life is very fulfilling; there are also some people who find that all they can do is what machines can do, there is nothing they can do, and their lives have no value. Even those rich people sympathize with him very much and give him a free income every month. You don't have to do anything, you just receive the money. But what is the meaning of his life?
You see, after the lack of determination, what we lack is meaning. People cannot live without meaning.
Yuval Harari made a particularly heart-wrenching statement here, saying that the embarrassment of the future will not be that life cannot continue, but that even the value of being enslaved and exploited has disappeared.
Therefore, equality may waver in this sense.
03 What turning points are about to happen to human civilization?
What is a turning point? It's just that you can't use old methods to deal with these turning-point new problems.
Trump's Problems and Solutions
Many people did not see these twists and turns, and they still acted according to the original story. Who should read this book the most? I think the first reader who should rush to read it is US President Trump. This is not my guess here. The first chapter of this book is about shouting out Trump.
You see, when Trump took office as President of the United States, he shouted "America First". Well, you are the President of the United States, so there is nothing wrong with you saying that; you said that you want to buy American goods and hire American workers, well, you are President of the United States, it’s okay for you to say that; but the question is how did he do it? He wants to build a wall on the border between the United States and Mexico, go to the European Union and say that the European Union is the enemy of us Americans, start a trade war with China, and so on.
Yuval Harari tells him in this book that even if you want to build a wall, you should not build it on the border between the United States and Mexico. You should build a wall to surround Silicon Valley in the United States. The people inside should no longer be allowed to work. Because what will take away American jobs in the future is the artificial intelligence being developed in Silicon Valley. Even if everything goes as planned and the trade war with China moves many jobs back to the United States, what will happen after they are moved back? You will find that they have all become robots, and there is no need to hire American workers. Therefore, there is a sentence in Yuval Harari’s book that tells us that we may be worried about the right dilemma, but we may be concerned about the wrong problem.
I think this sentence was meant for US President Trump. Of course, there are many situations where we judge the dilemma correctly but care about the wrong problem.
war
Let me give you another example. For example, many people are worried about whether our generation will encounter war in the future if the world is in such chaos. Yuval Harari reminds us that you have judged the dilemma correctly, but you are concerned about the wrong issue. ,Why?
Because war is no longer a means to solve problems in this era. What were the patterns of wealth in the past? It is the specific land and resources on it. And what is the shape of wealth now? It has become collaboration, data, science and knowledge.
Wealth of the past: land and other material resources
Wealth Now: Collaboration, Data, Technology and Knowledge
Do you still need to grab granaries, pastures, gold mines and land? So war can no longer solve the problem. So those of you who are worried about war, as this quote goes, you feel the dilemma, but you're probably concerned about what's going wrong.
Using dramatic thinking to solve the problem of terrorism may be more effective
Yuval Harari said that although terrorism is causing trouble to the whole world, we need to know what terrorists care about. Is it useful to just fight them? What they care about is not to achieve any real results by transforming the world. They just want to create sensational news. They want to create that kind of impact in a meaningful way, so they like to do those big things. So at this time, will it really be completely effective for us to use armed force to fight against terrorists? Maybe in addition to the military, we should ask a kind of person to solve this problem. Who is it? Director of television dramas.
Because he wants to create attractive dramas, we use dramas to counter his dramas. I guess you will find it strange when you hear this. How can it be possible to solve the problem of terrorists through TV directors?
Prison’s ideas for dealing with habitual offenders #notes
Let me tell you, this idea is valid. I have read at least one book, and it talks about a prison. There are naturally some people in this prison. The prisoners are dishonest and often fight. What was the original solution? The warden locked them up and beat them or put them in solitary confinement.
But one day a new warden came. The warden said I don’t use that method. Why? Because after they were put in solitary confinement, they were released and among the prisoners, they became heroes. They were even better. I don’t use this method.
What is his method? Once you break my rules, I'm sorry, but please eat a month's supply of children's food, Peppa Pig biscuits and the like.
After a month has passed, all the other prisoners will look down on you and laugh at you, and his arrogance will be knocked down. You see, isn’t this just using a drama director’s approach to a drama?
04 Why Chinese people should read "A Brief History of Today"
Now that you've got a taste of that statement, you may be feeling the right dilemma, but you're probably concerned about the wrong problem. Similar to this question, the book "A Brief History of Today" lists 21 for us.
Why Chinese people should read "A Brief History of Today" more
Why do you say that? Because what have the Chinese been doing in the past hundred years or so? In enlightenment, salvation, survival, and rise. Now we have the opportunity to be a part of inventing the next story of all humanity.
Of course, this book should also have a group of readers, which is the most important audience. This is not to praise you, but to the users who got the App and are now watching this conference.
It has been 40 years since China's reform and opening up, and now we are the second largest economy in the world. This is China’s global position now.
Not long ago, an artificial intelligence scientist wanted to return to China from the United States to work. Someone asked him, why do you want to return to China? He said that there are two biggest variables for all mankind in this era, one is China and the other is artificial intelligence. So for people like me, there are other choices in life. Of course, I can go back to China to engage in artificial intelligence. We Chinese are one of the biggest variables in the world, and we are the most curious about the future.
When CITIC Publishing Group published Harari's first two books, "A Brief History of Humanity" and "A Brief History of the Future," it took Harari on tours across China. Harari was frightened. He said: "I am just an ordinary historian. Why do you Chinese treat me like a rock star? Your applause is too warm and you have gathered too many people." This is China. We are so curious about the future. We are more curious about the future than anyone in the world can imagine.
Chinese people are more curious about the future than anyone in the world can imagine
At any stage, the West is a problem for us. We must learn from them. We Chinese are broad-minded. After all, we are not Westerners. But Yuval Harari told us today that there is something wrong with the West’s own story, and we are likely to have to break it into pieces and start over again to find the next common story for all mankind.
05 Meaning industry and security industry may give birth to the next great company
Panic is the norm but also an opportunity
Many people may feel panic after reading this book. The original stories are gone, how can I find the meaning of my existence?
Is this kind of panic unusual?
When the steam engine was invented, did the blacksmiths panic?
When the automobile was invented, did the coachmen panic?
At the end of World War II, when those who had been devastated by the war faced the behemoth of nuclear weapons, did their generation panic?
Panic has been the norm for the past 200 years, but there are always a group of people, present in every era, who think that mankind has many problems that I can solve through my creativity.
After World War II, when so many people were in panic, there were still a group of people starting businesses. Those great companies, such as Toyota and IBM, were focused on solving human problems of that era. So what was their success? It is a success achieved by solving new problems of mankind in a new environment.
Successful companies are companies that solve new problems for mankind in new environments.
Many people look at the stock market and wonder how they are doing so well. They are companies with hundreds of billions of dollars and companies with trillions of dollars. The answer is very simple: they have solved human problems.
Kevin Kelly once said that the truly great companies in the next 30 years have not yet been born. After reading the book "A Brief History of Today", I have a deeper understanding of this sentence. Why don't you look at who has a market value of over 1 trillion US dollars in the stock market now? Because we humans as a whole are facing brand-new problems, and solving brand-new problems requires brand-new companies and brand-new ideas, there are huge opportunities for our generation.
I sometimes chat with some entrepreneurs, and they always complain that it is difficult to find entrepreneurial projects. People who say this either misunderstand entrepreneurship or misunderstand what a company is. What is a company? Companies are designed to solve human problems. All great companies solve common human problems. The more common human problems you solve, the bigger the company will be. The more original your solution is, the longer your company will exist. So what is entrepreneurship? To start a business is to treat yourself as a worker and find a job for the entire society.
So for the rest of us, this book, A Brief History of Today, what is it? It's a 21-item list of big problems that our generation can solve. There are so many problems that we need to solve.
For example, we just said that many people are likely to fall into a state where life is meaningless. This is a problem. New industries will inevitably be born under this problem. Will there be a kind of meaning industry in the future?
Emerging industries that may be born in the future—meaning industries
What about finding a sense of value in life for those whose lives have no value? In fact, this matter has happened long ago in history.
During the Great Depression in the United States in the 1930s, the American film industry and broadcasting industry developed greatly, giving meaning to life to American workers in desperate situations.
Let’s take the security industry as an example. This security industry is not about installing some anti-virus tool into your computer. It is not a security industry.
An emerging industry that may be born in the future - data security industry
Do you realize this? We all have an operating system now, which is a biological operating system. In the future, those big companies will use their technology to hack into our operating system like a hacker and take away all kinds of our data. What are you taking away the data for? Don't think that this is a privacy issue. Many people say that our data leakage is a privacy issue. You have underestimated the problem.
In the future, people who may obtain your data will give you very unfair treatment. Don't think there's no sign, you know? Now some websites can determine which community you live in and what your past consumption records are. I know you don’t care much about money anyway, so the prices of the goods and services I see for you are more expensive than others. This matter has been reported by many media. The data you leak will make you suffer an unfair treatment.
Someone else has talked about such an idea. If one day, biotechnology develops greatly and a medicine is invented that can prolong life. Anyway, if you take one pill, you will live 50 years longer. Do you want to buy it?
Want to buy? Well, please note that the price will not be the same for everyone. With big data at that time, pharmaceutical companies knew how rich your family was. Everyone spent 50% of their property to buy this medicine. Some people got it for almost free, while others paid a lot. You said this might be another kind of fairness. But in the face of such a prospect, do you really not want to protect your data? Protecting your own data will be such a big industry in the future.
There is huge business value behind the list of human problems listed in "A Brief History of Today"
The book "A Brief History of Today" lists 21 issues for mankind in the future. All of these issues seem to be unsolvable dilemmas for us today. But for God’s sake, do these common predicaments of mankind require a historian to give us exact answers? Historians, please don’t write any more. This is what our generation has to do. Every time a problem is solved, huge social value will be generated, and then a very small part of it will be realized as commercial value. So I recommend that everyone who wants to start a business, or is potentially joining a startup, read this book.
Because here is your list of solutions to human problems, and behind each list topic is a company worth hundreds of billions or even trillions of dollars. This is why today at the world premiere of this book, we would like to recommend it to you.
Here I would like to quote a quote from Mr. Wang Bin, the chairman of CITIC Publishing Group and a senior publisher. When we were talking about this book, he told me that eliminating an old issue and creating a new one is how each generation of us promotes historical progress.
Therefore, everyone who publishes books actually has a mission. Many people say that book publishing is a sunset industry? Don't worry, it won't happen. Why? Because the bounden duty of the publishing industry is to promote the birth of new issues. Choose them, promote them, and condense stories that are recognized by the widest range of people. This matter will be valuable in any year or month. In this day and age, it's especially valuable.
some other thoughts
01
We are living in an era where the meaningful value provided by virtual products is catching up with the material value provided by original physical products.
This era of human hunger and lack of physical products is officially passing.
02
Without any psychological barriers, people can consume virtual products like a refrigerator or a vacuum cleaner. This is the future trend.
03
Nowadays, some things that seem commonplace to us, such as Confucius' "It is a joy to learn and practice it from time to time, and it is a joy to have friends come from afar." Because Confucius talked about it for more than two thousand years, it sounds good to us. It's vernacular.
04
Once some big stories are formed, they will not change for a long time, and the greatest blessing of our generation is that things that remain unchanged are undergoing subversive changes.
05
All colleagues should read these three books by Yuval Harari. They can help you understand the big framework of the future and the huge opportunities in history, and you can also better understand the company's business.
06
Yuval Harari implies a way of thinking about problems in his book, looking at the things that are unchanging on the largest scale.
There is one of the most unchanging things in human nature, which is called self-rationalization.
07
This world is creating new meanings in many parallel dimensions.
08.
In fact, the essence of human society is nothing but various chains of contempt.
09
Which era and which company is the greatest? The companies that produce the most scarce value of that era are the greatest.
10
No matter what you do in the future, you rely on your punches and kicks, and you think it is difficult for those smart people to push open the next door. What will help us push it open? It is to make completeness based on the current situation.
Harari is a representative figure who manages his own completeness
📝"A Brief History of the Future" | Interpretation by Wan Weigang
Three main points of the book
[Viewpoint 1] What drives social change is not our understanding of the real reality, but the fictional reality in our minds, that is, the power of religion. Humanism is the religion of the modern world. #memory
[View 2] There is a transaction between science and humanism, which makes our belief in humanism stronger and stronger now, and we must transform the world and ourselves based on this belief.
[View 3] But humanism has an essential flaw that will make this story impossible to tell in the future. A new story must be told.
first point of view
1. If you want to know the future, you must first understand the history.
The three major problems that have plagued mankind throughout history are famine, plague and war. Now, thanks to technological, economic and political progress, we have all three problems under control.
But we Homo sapiens are never satisfied, and now we are going to do three major things
Pursue eternal life
pursuit of happiness
Become a god directly
2. “People are the first precious thing”?
In the age of hunter-gatherers, humans were not considered the most precious
People in agricultural societies believe that God is the first precious thing and man is the second precious thing.
As soon as the theory of evolution appeared and the idea of God was overturned, people needed an updated theory to explain why people are superior to other animals.
3. Is it “consciousness” that makes people valuable and stronger than other animals?
But biologists can't explain consciousness. People don't need consciousness at all, and animals also have consciousness.
Therefore, "people are conscious" cannot be regarded as the theoretical basis for "people are the most precious".
4. Internet subjectivity #memory
The great thing about human beings, what enables them to achieve large-scale flexible cooperation, is not consciousness, nor the subjective reality imagined by individuals, but the so-called "Intersubjectivity"
God, country, money, companies, values, these are all interconnected subjectivities we imagine. #case
5. What is more critical is shared imagination
What historians are most concerned about is what stories people jointly imagined and invented in each period.
Moreover, not only do we have a stronger joint imagination, but we also use this fictional meaning to transform the world and even ourselves.
The fictional is much more important than the real. #memory
second view
1. Definition of “religion”
A religion that satisfies the following three characteristics is a religion
It has a set of moral laws that it claims were not invented by humans and cannot be changed by humans, requiring people to abide by them.
It gives people a promise: as long as you comply with this set of regulations, there will be some benefits
Its purpose is to consolidate the social order it envisions
The human rights that Western liberals talk about are actually religion.
2. We can’t live by science alone
3. Science and religion cannot interfere with each other
4. The moral guidance provided by religion is usually divided into three steps:
For example, should abortion be allowed? Catholic opposition to any form of abortion consists of three steps:
The first step of moral judgment: human life is sacred! Science has nothing to say about this. If you say it is sacred, then it is sacred.
The second step of factual statement: Life is already produced at the moment of conception, so even if it is only a fertilized egg, it cannot be aborted. Science has a strong say here.
The third step of moral guidance: Based on the previous moral judgment and factual statements, Catholicism requires that abortion cannot be performed.
5. Humanism, science’s attack on religion
In the past, science has been helping religion expand its power, but from now on, science is beginning to defeat religion.
The greatest religion at the moment is none other than humanism.
6. Liberalism, listen to your inner voice
The largest branch of humanism: the mainstream thought in Western countries—liberalism
Humanism advocates that we worship human nature, use human nature to replace the position of God in past religions, and use human experience to create meaning for the external world. That is, you should listen to your inner voice
7. Humanist Formula
Knowledge = Experience ✖ Sensitivity
8. Three schools of humanism
liberalism
I believe that no matter who you are, everyone’s inner experience is important and will make the world more colorful, so you should give everyone the right to express freely.
socialist humanist
I think liberals place too much emphasis on personal feelings, especially on each person's own feelings.
evolutionary humanists
It is simply wrong to think that "all emotions are important". Some people are just better than others, and we should let those who are outstanding stand out.
9. The war between the three factions
After two world wars and a cold war, the final result was that liberals won
If we look to the future at this moment, liberalism is in crisis.
third view
1. Liberalism values everyone’s experience
Based on three assumptions
First, I have an indivisible "self."
Second, this true self is completely free. That means I have free will.
Third, no one knows me better than myself. Only I know what I want. I cannot let others make decisions for me, no matter who they are.
Science has enough evidence that all three hypotheses are wrong.
First assumption: I have an indivisible self
The answer is wrong.
Experiments on left and right brains prove that people do not have "one" true self.
"Experiential self" and "narrative self" also prove that people do not have "a" true self.
[Experiencing self] When evaluating an experience, you have no sense of the length of the experience. You only care about the most intense part of the experience and the ending part. This is called the "peak-end rule".
[The narrative self] is always telling stories to make us feel that our lives are meaningful.
Second assumption: I have free will
[Free will] What scientists call free will is whether people can choose their own desires.
The answer is no.
Experiments on mice prove that human desires are not controlled by consciousness, but consciousness is controlled by desires.
The third assumption: No one knows myself better than I do.
The answer is wrong.
Computer algorithms know you better than you know yourself. It's in your own interest, you, me, all of us, to let algorithms make decisions for us
All three assumptions of liberalism have been overturned. Liberalism is really meaningless.
2. There are three trends in the world, corresponding to three different destinies of people.
First, if artificial intelligence is so powerful that the economic and military value of a human being as a worker is gone, then the political and economic system will deem humans worthless.
Second, maybe human beings as a whole are valuable, but each person as an individual is worthless.
Third, maybe some individuals are still valuable, but they are "supermen" who have been biologically upgraded.
3. In the 21st century, all human beings will be divided into three types of people by the trend of technological progress: useless people, people without autonomy, and gods #Memory
useless person
The industrial revolution brought about the proletariat, and now the AI revolution will bring about a new class: one that is neither economically nor militarily useful.
"People without autonomy"
As a whole, maybe valuable. But they may still be worthless as individuals because they may give up decision-making power
The relationship between computer algorithms and us can be divided into three steps
In the first step, the algorithm is equivalent to a prophet around us, that is, a fortune teller. If you have any questions, ask it, but the decision-making power is in your hands.
In the second step, the algorithm is equivalent to our agent. You tell it a general direction and principle, and it will execute it. As for some small decisions during the execution process, it has the final say.
In the third step, the algorithm becomes our monarch, and you simply obey it in everything.
"man of god"
Maybe there is a kind of person who is not controlled by the algorithm, but controls the algorithm
They are people who have taken the initiative to upgrade using biotechnology.
4. Data education and technological humanism
Judgment from scientific experiments, coupled with these three practical trends, liberalism is gone
New religions are brewing in the twenty-first century. One is called "technological humanism" and the other is called "data education".
5. Gods have side effects
Human experience can be upgraded, but it can also be degraded
While the market and economic system require them to make these upgrades, they will also be required to downgrade other cognitive abilities.
Technological humanists will be at a loss in the end. They will once again face a crisis of meaning.
6. Human history is a history of improved efficiency
From a mathematical perspective, we can imagine a person, an animal, a company or a country as a data processing system
If you imagine everyone as a processor, and communication between people is information exchange, then the entire human society is a data processing system
The entire history of mankind is the history of adding efficiency to this system.
7. The “Net of All Things” is the new religion. This is called data teaching, or dataism #notes
Values: Information must flow.
Discipline: Continuously produce and digest information, maximize your own information flow. #memory
Promise: If you allow information to flow freely and make the web of all things more and more perfect, it will benefit everyone.
8. Focus on three big issues
First, are living things really just a bunch of algorithms? Is life really just about data processing?
Second, which one is more valuable, intelligence or consciousness?
Third, what would society, politics, and daily life be like if unconscious but highly intelligent algorithms knew us better than we know ourselves?
Inventory of golden sentences #notes
What can truly enable large-scale flexible cooperation among groups of people is not a subjective reality imagined by an individual, but a fiction imagined by one person through the so-called "Intersubjectivity" that can be believed by everyone. God, country, money, companies, values, these are all interconnected subjectivities we imagine.
Human consciousness is a collection of various thoughts, feelings and desires. Various desires arise and disappear in our brains at every moment. Your decision may be the result of a negotiation of different desires, but you have no control over which desires will be present in this negotiation. But scientists can control it.
From now on - actually already - computer algorithms know you better than you know yourself, and for "your own benefit" you should let the algorithms make decisions for you. You, me, all of us, maybe should leave the decision-making power to the algorithm.
Someone recently conducted a large-scale study to determine the probability that positions in various industries will be replaced by artificial intelligence in the future. One of the interesting results is that the profession of archaeologist is relatively safe and the possibility of being replaced in the near future is very low. But this is not because archeology is too difficult - the more important reason is that archeology is an industry with little profit - it is not worth artificial intelligence companies to develop a system specifically for this industry...
At that time, the web of all things will become the first precious thing in the world, more precious than human beings. Improving this web of all things and finding ways to make it better serve people has become a sacred job. The Web of All Things is God, and scientists, programmers, doctors, teachers... all those who work for the Web of All Things are pastors. Perhaps the existence of this web of all things has found a new meaning for human existence. ——Isn’t this a new religion? This is called data education, or dadaism.
As of 2016, biologists cannot explain consciousness. In fact, the best answer scientists can give is that humans do not need consciousness at all. If we want to understand the decision-making process of the human brain and predict human behavior, it is enough to explain it through neural signal transmission. We can completely treat the human being as a computer—consciousness is just an additional by-product of this computer. It can also be said to be "spiritual pollution". #memory
The role of a historian is not just to give you a broader perspective, but to make you freer. The best reason to study history is not to predict the future, but to liberate yourself from the past and imagine a different destiny! #memory
History is actually the result of a series of accidental events. History may have different directions at every moment. If there is a parallel universe, we just happen to fall into this parallel universe. The reality we face today is nothing more than the historical shackles of these accidental events. If it is not inevitable, if it is not what the laws of nature require of us, then it can be changed.
📝"A Brief History of Humanity" | Interpretation by Zhang Xiaoyu
core content
"A Brief History of Humankind" is divided into four parts: cognitive revolution, agricultural revolution, human integration and unity, and scientific and technological revolution
This book believes that the unique language ability of Homo sapiens allows us to imagine virtual things, thereby organizing complex societies and achieving higher evolutionary efficiency through division of labor and cooperation.
But at the same time, this ability also puts most of us in more miserable situations
This is true from the peasants who were oppressed by theocratic and royal power in ancient times to the workers who are exploited by capitalism and consumerism today.
Each round of revolution and leap has not fundamentally changed this model, but has pushed the pros and cons of this model to a more extreme level: the more developed human imagination is, the more severe the suffering each individual faces.
About this book
"A Brief History of Humanity" attempts to answer some questions
The history of human development from the beginning of signs of life one hundred thousand years ago to the intertwining of capital and technology in the 21st century. One hundred thousand years ago, there were at least six human races on the earth. Why are we the only one left today?
We were once just an inconspicuous group in a corner of Africa, and our impact on the ecology of the earth was no different than that of fireflies, orangutans or jellyfish. Why can we reach the top of the biological chain and eventually become the masters of the earth?
Answers given in this book
The deepest and most fundamental driving force behind the brilliant civilization created by mankind from ancient times to today lies in the cognitive revolution driven by imagination.
And the way it uses the human "species" as a clue to outline the history of human civilization from ancient times to high-tech modern society is also the most innovative thing.
Part One: The Cognitive Revolution
Humans are not that special
From a physical and chemical perspective, it is nothing more than a combination of atoms and molecules. From a biological classification perspective, it is nothing more than a family of primate mammals called Hominidae.
In fact, higher animals such as chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans are very close to us in a biological sense.
📖 As the book says, 60,000 years ago, a female ape gave birth to two children, one of which became the grandfather of all chimpanzees, and the other became the grandmother of all humans.
Homo sapiens and other species
In middle school biology, species are divided into phyla, order, family, genus and species. Today's human beings belong to the species "Homo sapiens" under the genus "Human" and are the only species under this family and genus.
But in history, there have actually been other “human” races.
Neanderthals of the Middle East and Europe
Denisovans of Oceania
Archaeological and genetic studies have proven that a small number of these races other than "Homo sapiens" interbred with our ancestors, and a little bit of their genes remain in some peoples today, but the vast majority of ancient humans were between 70,000 and 30,000 They were wiped out by our ancestors years ago, or at least their living space was squeezed out by our ancestors, just like the dodo was hunted to extinction
But why can "Homo sapiens" defeat other ancient human races and win? You have to know that our ancestors were inferior to other races in terms of size, mobility and agility.
gossip theory
The most fundamental answer lies in the fact that our ancestors had a more developed ability, which is language ability. He introduced a very vivid and interesting theory: the gossip theory.
What does that mean? Biologists believe that animals like Homo sapiens can produce a particularly large number of sounds, which can be combined into many sentences and develop complex meanings.
But in fact, this ability is not uncommon in other animals. For example, monkeys also have different calls. They can use a special call to say, "There is a lion by the river, please don't drink the water!" This kind of cry can also convey information. Is "Homo sapiens" any different from them?
There are differences: Homo sapiens is an animal whose brain and language can express its own ideas about itself, that is, it can "gossip" about its own people.
This ability is amazing: if people in a tribe can gossip about members of their own tribe for several hours every day, then they can clearly know who in their tribe is more trustworthy and reliable. In the long run, everyone will be more trustworthy. By working closely together, the tribe will grow rapidly.
This gossip theory sounds strange, but it has been confirmed by many studies and experiments. Harari believes that it is the key to our understanding of the progress and development of human civilization.
Because if you think about it carefully, information such as "There is a lion by the river" still describes a real object.
But who in a tribe is good and who is bad, who is trustworthy and who has moral issues, is described by virtual objects, such as "good", "bad", "trust", "moral", etc.
And if a species can talk about virtual objects, it will have the possibility of dividing labor, cooperating, and forming a complex society.
To illustrate this point, Harari further cited a classic sociological research result, which is the "Dunbar's Number", also known as the Law of 150.
According to this law, if a group is maintained only by "gossip" communication between individuals, then the maximum size of the group is 150 people.
As long as it is within this scope, you don't need any institutional regulations. You can maintain normal operations by relying on interpersonal relationships alone, such as a small company, a small village, etc.
But if an organization wants to exceed this threshold of 150 people, it must have a premise, that is, everyone can imagine and believe a fictional story.
For example, in Catholicism, everyone believes in the crucifixion of Jesus, so believers who don't know each other also have common topics.
The same is true for a company, a society, and a country.
So what is the basis of this ability? This is what I just introduced to you, the ability to describe virtual objects.
language skills
This is the first crucial revolution Harari talks about: the cognitive revolution
The so-called cognitive revolution means that animals such as "Homo sapiens" have developed language abilities, which exceed the expression level of ordinary animals such as "there is a lion by the river" and can gossip about themselves.
And through Bagua's own ability, Homo sapiens developed the ability to describe virtual objects.
The ability to describe virtual objects allowed our ancestors to believe in one thing together, which made it possible for them to cross the threshold of 150 people, form a complex society, and develop a high degree of civilization.
changes in the way species evolve
Harari pointed out that this is a huge breakthrough even from the perspective of biological evolution.
Evolution based on genetic mutations
Because the evolution of species in the past was ultimately based on genetic mutations, such as monkeys turning into orangutans, and orangutans turning into humans.
What's wrong with this way of evolution? It's too long. How long did it take for genetic evolution from apes to humans? For 2 million years, the way of life of ape-men has not changed fundamentally.
An evolutionary approach based on division of labor and cooperation
However, it has only been 70,000 years since the emergence of Homo sapiens, and human lifestyles have undergone earth-shaking changes. Ultimately, this is because this species no longer relies on genetic mutations to move forward, but relies on division of labor and cooperation.
You may be surprised by this conclusion. After all, Darwin's evolutionary theory of species evolution and survival of the fittest is so famous, and the discovery of genes was one of the biggest breakthroughs in science in the 20th century. Now you tell me that biological evolution does not rely on genes, but on division of labor and cooperation? Is there any evidence?
Part Two: The Agricultural Revolution
Harari said, there really is, and this evidence is the second revolution he is going to talk about, which is the agricultural revolution. Let me tell you in detail.
Humanity in the Age of Collection #Notes
You can imagine before humans entered the agricultural age, the so-called gathering age. In this era, men hunted and women gathered fruits. There was no "slash-and-burn farming" and productivity was extremely backward. Then you may think that people in this era must have lived very miserable lives, often not having enough to eat, and not as smart as the humans who later entered the agricultural society, right?
But Harari tells you that your idea is exactly wrong. Archaeologists have proven that the nutritional status of ordinary people who lived in the gathering era was much better than that of ordinary people who later entered agricultural society. Their brain capacity was even larger than that of ordinary people who later entered agricultural society. In other words, from an evolutionary perspective, humans have experienced species degradation from the age of collecting to agricultural society. Why is this so?
Let me first explain why people in the collecting era have more developed bodies and brains than people in early agricultural societies.
The reason why they are in good health is that people in the foraging era ate a variety of foods with well-balanced nutrition. They had some mushrooms in the morning, some fruits at noon, and caught a rabbit at night.
On the contrary, the diet structure of ancient people who entered agricultural society was relatively simple most of the time.
For example, farmers in ancient China basically had three meals a day of dry food, and they were not exposed to pests or diseases or excessive taxes, otherwise they would suffer from malnutrition.
Scientists have also confirmed that the brain capacity of people in the collecting era was larger than that of people in agricultural societies.
This is because the natural environment that the collector has to face is very complex. He must be familiar with animals and plants, and know what can and cannot be eaten.
He has to be keenly aware of the surrounding environment. If there are rustlings in the grass, there may be a snake, and if he steps on it, he will die.
He must be good at sports. He can dig out bird's nests in trees and catch fish in rivers.
All this requires his brain to process very complex information.
On the contrary, many people in agricultural societies live in a small area all their lives, growing a small wheat field. Their life is simple and boring, their activities are narrow, and they never interact with each other even if they are dozens of miles apart. Their brains actually process less and less information.
Advantages and Pitfalls of the Agricultural Era
So since human individuals are actually experiencing degradation from the age of collecting to agricultural society, why do humans continue to evolve in this direction?
The answer is that agricultural society greatly increased the possibility for Homo sapiens to reproduce.
Because in the age of gathering, people had to move around and go wherever there was prey.
When relocating, children become a big problem. But once they entered an agricultural society and humans became sedentary animals, they could have children every year, and the population growth rate suddenly soared.
Although agricultural societies had high infant mortality, malnutrition, and smaller brain sizes, the overall population did increase.
This involves a fundamental issue of values. From a biological perspective, the criterion for evaluating evolution is not how strong or fast an individual is, but how much the species' genes have spread. Harari made an analogy. It's like today, whether a company is good or not depends mainly on how much money it makes, rather than whether its employees are happy or not.
Entering agricultural society, everyone's physical fitness has declined, but the transmission efficiency of ethnic genes has greatly improved. This is the true meaning of evolution.
Therefore, Harari said, the agricultural revolution seems to be a progress, but for individual human beings, it is actually a huge trap.
The Agricultural Revolution looks like humans successfully domesticated certain crops and livestock. In fact, conversely, it can also be said that these crops and livestock domesticated humans. They forced humans to serve their growth every day, plowing fields. Loose soil, water and fertilize, take good care of it.
Moreover, the development of agriculture enabled humans to create societies, countries, classes and religions, which led to class oppression and religious wars.
Humanity as a whole has indeed made rapid progress through division of labor and cooperation, but the suffering of each individual has increased.
If you don’t believe me, look at ancient civilizations. Egypt has the pyramids, Rome has the Colosseum, and China has the Great Wall. Aren’t these majestic world wonders all accomplished by the enslavement and oppression of ordinary people by pharaohs and emperors?
To put it bluntly, the Agricultural Revolution exchanged the miserable conditions of the majority of the people for a small group of people to become the supreme ruling class, and enslaved the majority of the people to create civilization.
Summary
This involves what Harari said, the second leap of human imagination brought about by the agricultural revolution.
first leap
It is the so-called "cognitive revolution". Human beings have developed the ability to imagine virtual things through "gossip", so they can surpass the "150 people" threshold of tribal groups.
So what does the second leap mean?
It refers to the fact that humans can construct a virtual political order through imagination.
Just like the reason why the ancient Egyptians obeyed the Pharaoh's order to build the pyramids, it was not only because they were afraid of the Pharaoh's authority, but also because they truly believed that the Pharaoh was the spokesperson of God on earth, and building the pyramids for the Pharaoh was part of obeying the divine order.
Everything comes from imagination
Harari said that the social order we live in is ultimately derived from imagination. This theory has three important manifestations #notes
First, the order constructed by imagination is closely integrated with the real world, so it is difficult for you to discover it.
For example, if a child lives in a medieval castle, he does not have his own room, and his every move is exposed to the eyes of others, so he is particularly concerned about his social status and sense of honor.
But in modern society, children all have their own rooms, so they will develop a belief in individualism. They feel that they don’t need to care about other people’s eyes and just live out their own values.
This kind of value belief and people's arrangements for their living environment are actually closely tied together. It's hard to say who caused which.
Second, the order of imagination shapes people’s desires.
For example, many people today want to travel abroad and buy a big villa. You think doing these things is a reflection of your free personality. In fact, they are all instilled in you by consumerism. You see movies, TV, advertisements, and Weibo every day. , Moments all tell you that you should give these things to your girlfriend.
So what should you give in ancient times? Give her a big pyramid to keep her heart blooming. In fact, whether it is a gift for a trip abroad or a burial, it is a very funny thing. These are all instilled in you by your imagination.
Third, the imaginary order connects people together.
For example, why is the dollar piece of paper valuable? In the final analysis, it is also because of imagination.
But it is the existence of this imagination that enables us to establish a transnational economy and establish international trade rules, allowing capital, goods and labor around the world to be exchanged.
Without this, human beings might return to their original state in an instant.
They are all derivatives of imagination
So Harari finally concluded that as human beings, we cannot escape from the order established by imagination.
Every time we think we have broken down the prison walls and are heading towards freedom, we are actually just arriving at another, bigger prison, slightly expanding the scope of our activities.
Throughout history, when humans imagine order, they are particularly good at imagining the differences between higher and lower classes. For example, white people are higher than black people, men are higher than women, and countless arguments have been given.
In fact, none of these arguments have anything to do with justice; they are merely derivatives of imagination.
You may ask, since the order is imaginary, then theoretically speaking, different people should imagine very different orders. For example, Westerners imagine that God created all things, and Chinese imagine that Pangu created the world. This was indeed the case in ancient society. But how to explain the era of globalization we are facing today? Is it because all mankind happened to imagine it together?
Part Three: The Integration and Unification of Humanity
Harari believes that starting from 1000 BC, there have been three orders that may really allow "all mankind to imagine being together", making people believe that it is possible for compatriots around the world to be together and governed by the same set of rules. These three orders are the order of money, the order of empire and the order of faith.
money order #list
Why is money so magical?
Harari said, because the money system has two major characteristics: everything is exchangeable and everyone believes it, and the former ultimately depends on the latter.
You may still remember the political economic point of view taught in middle school politics textbooks. Money is essentially a general equivalent, but Harari will tell you that this understanding is not essential enough.
The essence of money is as follows
It is the most common and effective mutual trust system ever developed. #memory
The biggest difference between it and religion is that only you believe in religion, while everyone believes in money. #memory
You believe it can be exchanged for material wealth, and so do I.
Even if we don’t know each other and don’t know each other’s character, just based on this trust, that is, you paid money, we can cooperate.
Imperial order, or violent order #list
This is easy to understand. Everyone understands the logic of money, and everyone understands the logic of swords.
But empires don't just rule by violence. It also spreads unified laws, writing, language and currency, and even a common culture. Moreover, most of the empire's elites themselves believe that they are working for the overall benefit of all the empire's subjects.
Harari specifically mentioned China. In ancient times, China believed that it should benefit all directions and spread Chinese culture. The so-called destiny is not to exploit the entire world, but to educate all peoples.
It is precisely because of this belief that no matter how divided China was in history, it would be unified.
In the 21st century, Harari believes that a new "global empire" concept is emerging, which may further break the boundaries of past nation-states, bring people around the world under its banner, and solve some common problems, such as environmental protection and development issues, etc. .
Religious order, or belief order #list
In fact, belief has been around since ancient times. We have said before that our ancestors Homo sapiens have the ability to imagine virtual things. They will naturally use this ability to imagine things that do not exist in the real world, such as ghosts and gods, such as God. From this, polytheism, monotheism, Different types of religion such as nature worship or ancestor worship.
But what Harari wants to point out is that many of the ideas and values in modern society are actually beliefs.
For example, the humanistic thought of early modern Europe was actually about worshiping and sanctifying human nature.
Harari said that modern society is against torture, which means giving so-called "humanitarian care" to criminals. There is no way to prove whether this is good or bad, but we believe that only in this way can human dignity be maintained, so we So do it.
So is social humanism. They believe that equality is the most important value, so they oppose privileges for the rich because it represents a greater emphasis on money than on humanity.
In the same way, modern society’s values and admiration for human rights, freedom, etc. are essentially part of the order of faith.
At this point, you may have questions. According to Harari’s explanation, are all the achievements of human civilization imaginary? Don’t these high-rise buildings, smart computers, and satellite rockets we build have any real foundation?
Harari’s answer is: not at all. This brings us to the final part: the scientific revolution.
Part 4: Scientific Revolution #Notes
The so-called science is essentially a system of knowledge. However, why can this knowledge system create huge productivity and destructive power, detonate atomic bombs, and send humans to the moon? Harari said that this is because the scientific knowledge system is different from all previous knowledge systems in three major ways:
The first is to be willing to admit your ignorance #list
Harari said a very classic saying: The scientific revolution is not a "revolution of knowledge", but a "revolution of ignorance." #memory
In the old days, whether it was Christianity, Buddhism or Confucianism, they all assumed that all important things in this world were already contained in the Bible, Buddhist scriptures and the Four Books and Five Classics.
Issues that are not mentioned in the classics are unimportant. For example, the Four Books and Five Classics do not mention how to build a ship, so building a ship must be unimportant and is a "strange and cunning technique."
If you want to understand the world, you don’t need to do anything else, just read these classics thoroughly.
Modern science is just the opposite. It first admits that it knows nothing about important issues, so it encourages the confrontation and collision of opinions.
The second is centered on observation and mathematics #list
This is also a major difference between modern science and past knowledge systems.
Harari gave an example. For example, there is a religion called Manichaeism. Manichaeism believes that everything in this world is a struggle between good and evil. Evil creates matter, and good creates spirit.
In fact, if you think about it, this kind of religion can basically be said to be omnipotent, and it can explain everything.
For example, my computer is broken, why is it broken? Because evil has affected my computer. I found a kind programmer to help me fix my computer, and good triumphed over evil.
The question is, does it tell you how to repair your computer? Absolutely not. So although it explains everything, it means nothing.
Modern science is centered on observation and mathematics.
The so-called "observation" is actually verification. You said your computer broke because of evil, can you verify it? If you can't verify it, you can only fall into a circular argument.
But I said that the computer is broken because the motherboard is burned out. Just replace the motherboard and it will be fine. This is knowledge that can be verified.
Of course, modern science can continue to use mathematical tools to calculate the extent to which electric current will burn out the motherboard, thereby establishing general laws and theories about computer damage.
The third is to use existing theories to acquire new abilities #List
Innovations in ancient society were basically random innovations, that is, during the labor process, occasionally craftsmen discovered that it was more efficient to improve the tool this way, and then it was recorded as a set of experiences passed down orally.
But modern science can start from existing theories, summarize laws, and point us to the direction of innovation, rather than relying on the inspiration of craftsmen.
But the scientific revolution has also brought new ways of imagining to people, that is, everyone believes that science and technology can continue to progress, and human society can continue to move forward. In fact, this belief has become the cornerstone of the operation of human society.
In 2016, the United States had a debt of US$22.8 trillion. To put it bluntly, it was borrowing money to develop. But why do you still believe that the United States can afford to pay back this money and will not go bankrupt?
The reason is that you believe that the United States' technological and economic strength will continue to advance, and as long as it can continue to grow in the future, it can continue to play this debt game. This is also the essence of all modern states and modern finance #memory
Disadvantages of scientific leaps
However, Harari also pointed out that the scientific revolution, like all revolutions in history, is the product of continuous leaps of human imagination and will also bring huge material benefits.
However, this leap is not necessarily a good thing for individual humans.
First of all, European countries took advantage of technological advantages to expand rapidly, which brought serious disasters to the world.
Conservative estimates show that in the more than 20 years from 1885 to 1908, 6 million people died in the Congo due to colonial rule.
Secondly, the rapid development of science and technology has caused a rapid increase in the gap between rich and poor around the world, and it is increasingly difficult for backward countries to catch up with advanced countries.
According to estimates, workers in Africa and Indonesia earn less food today than they did 500 years ago.
Therefore, global economic growth may also be a huge trap, which actually makes more people live in hunger and poverty.
Summarize
"A Brief History of Humankind" uses a species research perspective to survey world history and outline the nature of human progress and development: the more developed human imagination is, the more severe the suffering each individual faces.
To put it bluntly, our species is a species that lives in imagination and reality at the same time. This ability to live in "dual reality" has allowed us to achieve great achievements, but it has also made most of us fall into more miserable situations. The situation is the same from the peasants who were oppressed by theocratic and royal power in ancient times to the workers who are exploited by capitalism and consumerism today.
Each round of revolution and leap has not fundamentally changed this model, but has pushed the pros and cons of this model to more extreme levels.
Harari came to this conclusion not to be alarmist or to gain fame. He has no interest in arousing your recognition of him by arousing your anxiety. His purpose is to look forward to the future for all mankind. Why do you say that?
Because today's technological progress has reached a point where it is possible for humans to cross the boundaries of biology, use technological means to transform themselves, and complete the next step of evolution.
In other words, the way species evolve has progressed from genetic evolution to division of labor evolution in the past, and may continue to progress from division of labor evolution to technological evolution in the future.
From a traditional perspective, this doesn't seem like a bad thing. But now that you understand "A Brief History of Humanity", you will know that there are deeper crises and changes hidden behind it. Harari’s point of view is that behind every revolution and leap, there is great suffering suffered by individual human beings, and this time will be no exception. #memory
Harari’s speech at Tsinghua University in 2016 extended his conclusion in this book: If a minority group of humans can really use technology to transform their bodies and minds, becoming immortal or superhuman with computer-like memory, Then class inequality will expand into inequality between species, and the suffering of most people may be more severe than in several periods of change in history.
As it is said at the end of "A Brief History of Humankind", "The only thing we can do now is to influence the direction they take. Since we may soon be able to transform our desires, perhaps the real question to ask is not "What do we want to change?" "What will become", but "What do we really hope we want?" If you still take this problem lightly, maybe you really haven't figured it out yet." #Memory
illustrate
This document has been edited and organized for the second time, adjusting the typesetting, shrinking and advanced styles to make it easier to read.
pending upgrade
✔️Corresponding books, get integration of listening notes
✔️Brief History Trilogy Speed Notes Integration
Wonderful original text of the original book, excerpts of illustrations
English excerpt from the original book
Advanced formatting instructions
【Red】❗️ Expressions worth thinking about
【Green】👣tell stories, 📝tell cases, 📊list data, 📖talk about history and read books, 🌰give examples
The #notes tag locates content in the document that I personally think is worth recording and re-reading.
Summary of the trilogy of brief history
📖"A Brief History of Humanity" summarizes the past of mankind and how prudent Homo sapiens became the ruler of the earth.
🔍"A Brief History of the Future" focuses on thinking about the next few thousand years, how humans will eventually become gods, and what will be the fate of intelligence and consciousness in the end.
❓"A Brief History of Today" is a book that reflects on the major global issues of mankind today.
📔"A Brief History of Humanity": From Animals to God
cover
Publication information
Author: [Israel] Yuval Noah Harari
Translator: Lin Junhong
Publisher: CITIC Publishing Group Co., Ltd.
Edition: 2017-2-2
Printing time: 2017-9-16
History begins with man creating God
Part One: 🧠Cognitive Revolution
time #notes
1. About 13.5 billion years ago, the matter, energy, time, and space of the universe became what they are today, forming the science of physics.
2. Approximately 3.8 billion years ago, molecules combined to form a fine structure - the organism, achieving biology
3. 2.5 million years ago, humanoid creatures appeared
4. About 2 million years ago, different human species existed in the entire world, including Homo Rudolfus in East Africa, Homo erectus in East Asia, and Neanderthals in Europe and West Asia. However, it is only known that about 10,000 years ago, only Homo sapiens remained. This kind of person
5. About 70,000 years ago, "Homo sapiens" began to create more complex structures, forming "culture", and culture continued to develop, forming history.
There are three kinds of revolutions on the road of history -
The “cognitive revolution” 70,000 years ago,
The “Agricultural Revolution” 10,000 years ago,
The “Scientific Revolution” about 500 years ago
reason
Natural genetic mutation
There is a lion by the river
Can convey more and more information about the environment around Homo sapiens, and plan and execute complex plans
Like running from a lion or hunting a buffalo
Gossip
Ability to convey greater amounts of information about Homo sapiens social relationships and organize larger, more cohesive groups of up to 150 people
Communities, companies, social networks, military units and other groups are still affected by this
fictional story
Ability to convey information about fictional concepts such as tribal patron saints, nations, limited companies, and human rights
In modern society, businessmen and lawyers are wizards, setting rules and building communities.
The company is a collective imagination
Homo sapiens
time #notes
1 million years ago
Features
Big brain
Occupies volume and consumes a lot of money
cost
Muscle atrophy
Spend more time looking for food
Walk upright
Evolution in a shorter time period has prompted humans to be born prematurely
Outstanding social skills
Strong plasticity
use tools
middle of food chain
More than 1 million years ago, despite having large brains and stone tools, they were still in the middle of the food chain and relied on collecting to survive.
The main purpose of early stone tools was to allow humans to finish their meals on large animals, approach the few remaining prey carcasses, crack open the bones, and eat the only edible marrow to sustain themselves.
Top of the food chain
400,000 years ago, several human species began to hunt large animals. It was not until the rise of Homo sapiens 100,000 years ago that humans jumped to the top of the food chain.
Humanity has reached the top in a blink of an eye, catching the entire ecosystem off guard. Many ecological disasters are caused by this too hasty historical jump.
Evolution at the top
Between 70,000 and 30,000 years ago, Homo sapiens invented boats, oil lamps, bows and arrows, needles, and the first sculptures that could be called works of art, as well as religion, commerce, and social stratification
Key Achievements of the Cognitive Revolution
form different languages and cultures
Part 2: 🌽Agricultural Revolution
collecting society
The formation of the gluttonous gene
Ancient collectors, if they encountered high-calorie sweets, in order to survive, the best choice would be to eat them until they could no longer eat them.
Even today, despite the abundance of material resources, humans are still unable to quit high-energy diets, leading to a widespread obesity problem.
monogamy
Evolutionary psychologists believe that ancient tribes had no monogamy and no concept of fatherhood. A group of people jointly raised tribal children.
Supporters of "ancient communes" believe that monogamy is the cause of interpersonal alienation and high divorce rates in post-industrial society.
Life
A gathering society hunted about once every three days, and 3 to 6 hours each time was enough to feed the tribe, which was shorter than modern people's working hours.
Most live to be 60 or even 80 years old
Omnivorous habits, no malnutrition
War is a social phenomenon that has appeared in collecting societies. Human beings are closely related but they still kill the old and the weak
Agricultural Society
Domestication
animal domestication
Park 9000 BC, goats
Park 4000 BC, horse
Park 3500 BC, camels
plant domestication
Park 9000 BC, wheat
Park 8000 BC, peas and lentils
5000 years ago, olive trees in front of the park
3,500 years ago in the park, grapes
3,500 years ago in the park, cashew nuts
From 9500 B.C. to 3500 B.C., wheat, rice, corn, and potatoes
Influence
Food increases, human survival crisis weakens, population surges, and pampered elites emerge
generate various meanings
1. The concepts of home and territory emerge.
After the awareness of the private domain of "home" has been strengthened, "hamster syndrome" has become more and more serious, and people are willing to hoard property.
2. The importance of “the future” has become increasingly prominent.
Learning to look at the weather and predict the future affects the survival of Homo sapiens
3. Text
reason
1. The brain has limited capacity
2. Human beings are bound to die.
3. The human brain has gradually become accustomed to storing and processing only specific types of information, and its ability to accurately store numbers has weakened.
definition
Text is a way of storing information using physical symbols #notes
type
Sumerian writing
Andes
ancient egyptian hieroglyphs
China and Mesoamerica: 1200 BC in China, complete ideograms produced in Mesoamerica between 1000 BC and 500 BC
In the post-agricultural revolution era, human beings have developed rapidly through writing and shared fictional stories, which has resulted in different classifications of social groups.
free man/slave
rich/poor
white/black
Part Three: 🌐The Integration and Unification of Humanity
The direction of history #notes
What lasts a long time will inevitably separate. It is just a temporary situation. What will last a long time will inevitably merge. This is the general trend.
10,000 years before the park, collectors only knew their own island
Before arriving in Europe in the 19th century, no one knew Tasmania existed for 12,000 years
In 2000 BC, there were only two to three thousand human civilizations left.
Four worlds of considerable size and complexity
1. Mesoamerican World
2. Andean World
3. Australian World
4. Atlantic World
Today's world
The same geopolitical system
same economic system
same legal system
same scientific system
currency
The condition for all humans to become “us” (the basis for cooperation between sapiens and strangers)
economic monetary order
political imperial order
global religion
Gatherers have no concept of money at all
Self-sufficiency, forming an economic system based on favors and obligations
Unable to obtain rare items, so exchange them from strangers
agricultural revolution period
Each village is self-sufficient and requires only certain services
After the rise of cities and kingdoms
Improvements in transportation infrastructure finally gave rise to opportunities for specialization
Dense cities begin to support professional workers
Specialized occupation
shoemaker
doctor
carpenter
lawyer
Exchange goods and protect basic life
How goods made by different experts are traded
Money works on trust
The human world exists in the common imagination and is made up
principles of money system
Everything is replaceable
Believed by all
Using money as a medium, any two people can cooperate on various plans
One of the most important decisive factors in the rapid development of human society
empire
Conditions: The empire must have rulers of different ethnic groups, with different cultures and independent territories
Features: The territory can be flexibly adjusted and can be expanded almost infinitely.
common criticism
1. The imperial system has its own flaws, which makes it difficult to rule different ethnic groups efficiently in the long run.
2. Even if it can be governed, it must be done immorally. Empire is the engine of all kinds of evil and exploitation
religion
law
1. The superhuman order it believes in must be universal and true regardless of time and space.
2. It must firmly spread this belief to the masses
development path
From the pantheism of the gatherer society to the agricultural revolution, the religious revolution also emerged.
In the values of collectors, humans and animals are equal, and every animal must be respected
The original religious significance of the Agricultural Revolution: turning animals and plants from beings equal to humans to belongings of humans
The emergence of "gods", gods can be kind to humans and negotiate with these silent animals and plants
Part 4: 💻Scientific Revolution
discover one's ignorance
Time: Human power has grown unprecedentedly in the past 500 years. In 1500 AD, the population was approximately 500 million, and now the population is 7 billion.
The difference between modern scientific system and previous knowledge system
1. Previous knowledge systems were based on omniscience, but modern science admits its own ignorance #notes
2. Center on observation and mathematics
3. Use existing capabilities to develop new technologies
The criterion for value judgment of “knowledge” lies in its practicality, which is based on whether it allows humans to create new substances, gain power or rights.
Nationalism is the only modern ideology in which death remains central
The impact of ideology on science
One of the conditions for the development of scientific research is to join forces with certain religions or ideologies, which may then influence or even influence research results.
The marriage of science and empire
Common mentality and starting point: admit one’s ignorance
European imperial expeditions changed the course of the world: national cultures transformed from independent development to the gradual integration into a single human society
The relationship between science and empire
Scientists provide the empire with practical knowledge, ideological foundations, and technological tools
The Empire provided scientists with material funding, information, and protection, and ensured the widespread dissemination of research results
capitalist dogma
The role of credit: Capitalism uses human credit to realize the rules of small capital operating big capital
Conditions for the rise of capitalism: “Trust” underpins money transactions
The role of capitalism: Promoting the rise of modern science and also influencing the emergence of European imperialism
The relationship between government and capital markets: reduce intervention and allow the market to operate freely
giant ship of industry
finite theory
Are energy and raw materials limited?
Limited stages: When energy is almost exhausted, new replacements can always be found.
Optimistically speaking, energy is inexhaustible
a permanent revolution
After the Industrial Revolution, animals faced a survival crisis and Homo sapiens became the global hegemon.
Homo sapiens isolated themselves from nature and created a set of standards to live by
The state and market are replacing the old ways of family and community
Nuclear power becomes the only check and balance standard and means in the new world
happy happy days
Money is not everything, the happiness that money brings has its limits
The biological explanation of “happiness”: producing enough serotonin, dopamine and oxytocin #notes
Projected future: The end of Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens maintain their lives by connecting to machines and other biological creations, and the future of sapiens will become the existence of non-homo sapiens.
Crisis awareness: Intelligent robots develop independent consciousness and rise up to resist their human masters
Two possibilities: Homo sapiens evolved or was completely wiped out, and the development of history is still unknown.
📔"A Brief History of the Future": From Homo sapiens to the god of wisdom
cover
Publication information
Author: [Israel] Yuval Noah Harari
Translator: Lin Junhong
Publisher: CITIC Publishing Group Co., Ltd.
Edition: 2017-2-1
Printing time: 2017-8-18
Prologue: 📜New issues of mankind
defeat death
The emergence of immortality will lead to fundamental inequality between people
eternal happiness
Biochemistry re-creates Homo sapiens to provide endless pleasure
man becomes god
path
Bioengineering: Humans fully exploit their potential within existing organic body structures
Cyborg Engineering: Combining a variety of non-organic devices, retaining the organic brain as the core
If the mind changes from carbon-based to silicon-based, the structure of the mind changes, Homo sapiens disappears, and human history comes to an end.
non-organic bioengineering
Intelligent software replaces neural networks
Inorganic life replaces organic life
clarify
1. The above refers to "humanity as a whole", not most individual people.
2. This is a historical prediction, not a political goal
3. Pursuing may not necessarily result in getting
4. Forecasting is not for the purpose of prophecy. Predictions can change the future after discussion.
Marxism did not overthrow the regime, this prediction alone allowed them to make changes
The meaning of history: Historical knowledge will change our future behavior. Studying history is to liberate ourselves from old meanings.
The paradox of knowledge: knowledge (prediction) is useless without changing behavior. Once behavior changes, the original knowledge (prediction) immediately loses its meaning.
On the road to becoming a god, there are no brakes
Each expert has his or her own specialty. No one understands the entire system. No one knows where the brakes are.
The modern economy can only grow endlessly, and the brakes will collapse. It can only pursue sustainable goals: immortality, happiness, and divinity. (The three are inseparable)
Part One: 🌎Homo sapiens conquer the world
How humans treat other animals (World)
fact
Humans exterminated and conquered other large animals and dominated the world
Humans, like other animals, have a set of biological algorithms for reproduction. Emotions and desires help us find paths quickly.
idea
hunter gatherer
Hunter-gatherers do not feel superior to other creatures. Human survival depends on understanding and respecting the desires of the animals around them.
Hunter-gatherers tended to be animistic and communicate with all living things
farmer
Farmers' quality of life depends on the animals they can control
Theism promises Homo sapiens to be dominant and exploit all other living things. Such as Christianity
Theism, God is responsible for mediating between human beings and ecological and environmental systems.
The gods were responsible for protecting agriculture, in exchange for human contributions, at the expense of the ecosystem
modern man
Theism uses the name of God as an excuse for traditional agriculture, while humanism uses the name of man as an excuse for modern industrialized agriculture.
Humanism is based on the belief that Homo sapiens possess certain unique and sacred human qualities that animals do not have, so nature is not important.
What's special about humans
People have souls
If the soul evolved, then it would be contrary to the nature of evolution for it to be an indivisible, eternal entity.
If the soul suddenly appeared in a human being, it is unimaginable that there was no trace of soul before him or his parents.
People have souls
If everything is in our neuron network, why separate the mind?
If the mind is higher than the neural network, then where is it?
The web of human meaning
Animals can only imagine what actually exists
One can imagine intersubjective things, but they have real and powerful power, such as countries, companies, laws, etc.
People organize large-scale collaboration through fictional stories. This is the fundamental reason why human power is amplified and dominates the world.
If you want to decipher the future of mankind, you must decipher the various fictional imaginations that give meaning to the world.
Part 2: 🎨Homo sapiens give meaning to the world
Storytellers: The power of stories #notes
Animals all live in dual realities of objective reality and subjective experience. The world of Homo sapiens has a third reality, with various stories about money, gods, countries and companies.
70,000 years ago, the cognitive revolution allowed humans to start talking about things that only existed in human imagination. This can facilitate the cooperation of hundreds or thousands of people
5,000 years ago, people invented writing and money
Words allow people to organize society in an algorithmic way. Each person completes a small step, and the final important decision is judged by the entire algorithm. This is the essence of the bureaucracy.
The state issues a piece of paper and forces citizens to use this piece of paper to pay taxes. Citizens have no choice, but the market develops.
Story should be just a tool, not the goal
We should distinguish between reality and fiction. The status of reality is of course higher than fiction. The euro can depreciate but it is not painful.
In the future, there will be more powerful fictional concepts and more totalitarian organizations, so it is particularly important to distinguish between reality and fiction.
Fictional stories make it easier for humans to cooperate, but the cost is that stories also determine the goals of our cooperation
Enemies: Science and Religion
religion
Religion is not the same as superstition. What you believe must be "truth"; only what others believe can be "superstition"
Religion is not supernatural, it is natural for people who believe in demons, gods, spirits
Religion is not a question of whether you believe in "God"
Religion is not the same as spirituality #notes
Religion is to consolidate the secular order, spirituality is to escape
Spiritual journey is only suitable for individuals, not for society
If human beings want to collaborate, there can’t be just problems and no norms.
Religion is an all-encompassing set of stories that gives human laws, norms, and values greater legitimacy than the average human being
The definition of religion should lie in its social function, not whether there is a god
Christianity, communism, and liberalism can all be regarded as a religion
The historical laws of communism are actually like the commandments of the Christian God
science and religion
If science wants to create a viable human system, it will inevitably need the assistance of religion.
Research facts but do not make ethical judgments
Religion does not merely govern ethical judgments; it always contains statements of fact.
Three parts of a typical religious story #notes
1. Ethical judgments, such as “human life is sacred”
2. Factual statement, such as "Human life begins at the moment of conception"
3. A combination of ethical and factual statements, with specific instructions such as "You cannot have an abortion even if it is just one day old."
Science cannot refute the ethical judgments of religions, but it can refute the factual statements.
Science and religion are easier to compromise and cooperate than imagined #notes
What religion cares about most is order
What science cares about most is power
Modern history is actually a process of coming to terms between science and a specific religion (humanism). Modern society believes in humanism, and science is not to question, but to realize its dogma.
Contract with "Modern"
Pre-modern people believed they were living within some great cosmic plan, which limited human power but also gave everything meaning
"Modern" is a contract, the essence of which is: people give up meaning in exchange for power
Without meaning, the reason why modern society is still developing is because of the rise of a revolutionary new religion: humanism
humanist revolution
The contract with modernity is to gain power and relinquish meaning.
But there is a loophole clause, meaning and power can be achieved if humanity finds meaning outside of the overall cosmic plan.
man finds humanism
dogma of humanism
Humanist Politics: Voters can make the best choices
Humanistic Economics: The customer is always right
Humanistic Aesthetics: The person who sees it thinks it is beautiful, it is beautiful
Humanistic Ethics: If it feels right, do it
Humanistic education: think for yourself
The split in humanism
Classical Orthodoxy: Liberalism. Everyone is a unique person with experiences that will never be repeated
Branch One: Social Humanism.
Socialism blames liberalism for focusing too much on one's own feelings and ignoring the experiences of others.
Branch Two: Evolutionary Humanism.
The conflict of various experiences and feelings is inevitable, and the fittest wins.
Part 3: ⁉️Homo sapiens lose control
Time bomb in the laboratory
free will
The basis of liberalism is that people have free will. This is a statement of fact.
Fact statement science can intervene
Every electrochemical reaction is determined by the previous event, so the final decision reached is definitely not free will.
If the decision is caused by the random movement of atoms, of course this is randomness and not free will.
According to the theory of evolution, all so-called "selections" of animals are responses to genetic codes.
individualism
Liberalism believes that everyone has a single, indivisible self
Split-brain experiment, self is physically separable
Ice water experiment, people have two selves: experiencing self and narrative self
great separation
A scientific response to the insistence that people are irreplaceable
1. Biology is an algorithm.
Every animal (including Homo sapiens) is an evolved collection of algorithms
2. The function of the algorithm is not affected by the constituent substances.
Whether the beads of an abacus are made of iron or wood makes no difference to the calculation.
3. As long as the calculation is correct, there is no difference between silicon-based or carbon-based
Superman controls the world and humans lose equality
Algorithms control the world and humans lose their sanctity
Humanity as a whole will still have value, but individuals will no longer have authority and most choices will be governed by external algorithms
Human beings have absolutely no value
Algorithms become entities like companies and countries, controlling humans
What do useless people do? They can only live on drugs and playing games.
Humans will most likely be in captivity or exterminated because the system is smarter than people and you have no control over its motivations
Whether algorithms or superhumans take over the world, liberalism will collapse
The new religion of technological humanism
Still believing that humans are the pinnacle of creation, Homo sapiens upgrades to god-man, fighting against the most complex mindless algorithms
Just like humans can only see a small segment of the spectrum, the psychological spectrum is much wider than what we experience. Becoming a godman can explore new lands of the mind.
Technological humanism faces an unsolvable dilemma. It believes that human will is the most important thing in the universe, so it promotes human development and control. However, once the will is controlled, human beings lose their sanctity and cannot stand in the face of technology.
The new religion of dataism
Dataism believes that the universe is composed of data, and the value of any phenomenon or entity lies in the contribution of data processing.
economic system
The mechanism of the economy is to collect data about desires and abilities and then translate them into decisions
Capitalism won the Cold War not because it was more ethical or because God was angry with the Soviet Union, but because at this stage decentralized data processing was better than centralized
political system
Democracy and autocracy are essentially two opposing mechanisms for collecting and analyzing information.
If data cannot be processed in a limited manner, the noble institutions of the past such as elections, political parties, and parliaments may become obsolete.
Authoritarian regimes are also unable to cope with the speed and volume of data flows
All mankind is a data system, and individuals are chips #notes
There are 4 ways to improve efficiency
1. Increase the number of processors. #list
A city with a population of 100,000 has a capacity higher than a village with a population of 1,000
2. Add processor types. #list
The dialogue between farmers, priests, and physicians produced ideas that would never have been discussed among hunter-gatherers.
3. Increase connections between processors. #list
10 cities with trade have higher output than 10 isolated cities
4. Increase the freedom of flow of existing connections. #list
Just like getting rid of things like highway tolls
Humanity has gone through 4 stages of development #notes
1. Cognitive revolution, a large number of homo sapiens can be connected into a single data processing network
2. The Agricultural Revolution, a massive increase in population, and an increase in human cooperation networks.
Increased number of processors, types and connections
3. From the invention of writing and money to the beginning of the scientific revolution, connections have become very close
4. In the last stage, from the geographical discovery to the present, information flows freely in the global network, and the quantity and speed are getting faster and faster.
Today’s democracies and markets win not because they are “good” but because they improve global data processing systems #memory
For dataism, freedom of information is the highest good
The first commandment of dataism: connect more and more media and generate more and more information
The second commandment of dataism: Connect everything to the system, even the heretics who don’t want to join
Dataism treats human experience as data patterns, thus destroying people’s authority and source of meaning.
Dataism believes that experience has no value if it is not shared, and people do not need (or even cannot) find meaning in their own hearts. What we have to do is wait for the algorithm to figure out the meaning
As long as there are better algorithms and data, human biological algorithms will naturally be eliminated
The Internet of Everything itself has a sacred meaning
Dataism is as much a threat to humans as humans are to other animals. Data doesn’t care about our subjective needs
The three most important matters and corresponding questions
Question 1: Is biology really just algorithms, and life really just data processing?
1. Science is converging under the all-encompassing dogma that all living things are algorithms and life is data processing
Question 2: Which one is more valuable, intelligence or consciousness?
2. Intelligence is decoupling from consciousness
Question 3: How will society, politics, and daily life change when unconscious but highly intelligent algorithms know us better than we do?
3. Unconscious but highly intelligent algorithms may soon know us better than we do
📔"A Brief History of Today": Big Issues on Human Destiny
cover
Publication information
【Author】[With] Yuval Harari 【Translator】Lin Junhong
Publisher: CITIC Publishing Group
Original title: 21 Lessons for the 21st Century
Publication year: 2018-8
Number of pages: 353
ISBN: 9787508692098
Part One: 💻Technological Disruption
【1】Human beings are organized by stories
end of history theory
Liberalism wins out from communism, fascism, and liberalism
I am also disillusioned with liberalism. China’s development proves that the Communist Party is not standing on the wrong side of history. Humanity has no more stories to tell.
current reality
Liberalism is facing challenges due to the rise of nationalism, Brexit, Trump's election, and the resurgence of religious extremism.
Nationalism and religion are back, but they cannot replace liberalism as the new story of all mankind.
❗️The real challenge
Biotechnology changes people's bodies and minds, destroying the cornerstone of liberal personality.
Artificial intelligence creates a useless class and undermines the political foundation of liberalism.
Only a new story explaining the biological and information revolution can replace liberalism
【2】Employment issues
Human vs AI
Humans have two abilities: physical abilities and cognitive abilities
Physical abilities have been surpassed by machines after the industrial revolution
Human cognitive and creative abilities are reduced to biological algorithms and can also be surpassed by AI
In addition to human capabilities, AI also possesses two important non-human capabilities: "connectivity" and "updatable"
The advantage of connectivity allows computers to be integrated into networks
For example, human drivers cannot share information in real time, but autonomous driving is safer when connected to a network.
Updatable makes it easy to change the rules
For example, if traffic rules are changed, humans will learn in sequence, and autonomous driving can be updated simultaneously to make it safer.
Three possible solutions to the disappearance of jobs
Possible solution one: give up artificial intelligence development
Avoiding government-forced abandonment of the huge potential of AI and robots is the least attractive and most unachievable strategy.
Possible option two: Create enough new jobs
After even the service industry and creative industries are replaced by AI, humans as producers have nowhere to go.
When customers become algorithms, such as the advertising industry’s customers being Google search algorithms, humans as consumers no longer matter.
Possible solution three: Protect people, not jobs
Provide universal basic income or universal basic services.
How to divide the "whole people"? It is the rich countries that can provide basic income, but it is the people of poor countries who are the first to lose their jobs.
What is "basic"? People will always take what they have for granted and be aggrieved by what they cannot get.
Providing an economic safety net, combined with strong community and meaningful purpose, is what keeps humanity safe.
【3】Free questions #notes
In the past, divine authority was established through religious mythology.
In the liberal story, man's authority comes from his having free will.
Politically, liberalism believes in "choice making good choices."
Economically, liberalism believes that "the customer is always right."
Personally, liberalism encourages everyone to “listen to your heart and do whatever you want.”
In the future, belief in individual freedom is overturned and authority comes from big data algorithms.
Individuals lose decision-making power
People don’t need to make moral decisions, the algorithm pre-sets the options
People don’t need to make decisions based on preferences, algorithms know you better than anything else
Data hegemony may emerge, and citizens face complete surveillance beyond "1984"
People will be domesticated into data-producing animals, and no one will care about your feelings and mind anymore.
【4】Equality issues
Equality in the historical process #notes
In ancient times, there was too little property and the issue of equality was not prominent.
Class society emerged after the agricultural revolution, and inequality was considered a natural state #notes
Since modern times, both communism and liberalism have regarded equality as an ideal goal
In the future, inequality will tend to solidify
The biological revolution allows the wealthy to turn inequality into biological disparity.
The information revolution has rendered ordinary people useless and deprived of their political and economic power to negotiate.
If we want to avoid excessive concentration of wealth and power, the key is to regulate data ownership.
In a natural state, large companies will accumulate more and more data and become dominant.
Nationalizing data can inhibit companies, but it can also lead to data hegemony.
Putting data in the hands of individuals sounds good, but data is not land. How to implement it?
Part Two: 🌎 Political Challenges
【5】Community issues
Human beings need to deal with the body, senses, and real environment, but technology has made us farther and farther away from the body.
Although the entire planet is more connected, everyone's life is more lonely than before, and various intimate communities are also disintegrating, which is also the root of many social and political problems.
The decline of the cohesion of the country and religion is not the main reason for alienation between people, but the loss of connection between people and the body.
Facebook's online communities are not a substitute for real-world community life. Its business model also requires people to stay online longer.
Tech giants are still developing devices like VR glasses. In the future they will control our entire bodies in the same way they control our eyes, fingers and credit cards now.
The value of community
Meaningful communities strengthen social fabric and bring humanity closer together
Let humans shift their attention from online to offline, and only use the Internet when it is useful. Currently, the social significance is greater than the profit significance #notes
【6】Civilization: Harmony of the World
It is wrong to compare the conflict of civilizations to the competition between species. #notes
Civilization is different from species. It has no "essence". Human behavior defines each civilization.
Animals split into different species and never merge again, but humans merge all the time.
Modern civilizations are interconnected #notes
Politics: Even if the independence and uniqueness of each country are emphasized, the premise is still that there is a consensus on the boundaries of the rights of sovereign countries.
Economy: Everyone believes in pretty much the same version of capitalism, and ISIS fighters don’t burn dollars.
Science: There is no special "juche science". North Korea does not believe that E=MC^4, otherwise there would be no nuclear issue.
【7】Nationalism: Unable to solve global problems
Nations formed because humans faced challenges that no tribe could solve alone.
A common global enemy gives mankind a common identity. #notes
Nuclear war, no single country can control the outbreak of nuclear war
Ecological collapse and environmental externalities mean that it is naturally a global problem that requires international collaboration to solve.
Technological subversion, nationalists have no answer to the scientific revolution, this is not within their scope of thinking, and humans need recognized ethical principles to deal with these problems.
We already have a global ecology, a global economy, a global science, and political globalization has become a necessary option.
【8】Religion: Gods only serve the country
The role of traditional religion
Technology, religion lost out to science and had almost no influence in the field of technology.
Economics, the modern world will only use economics to explain religious events, and will never use religion to explain economic events.
Identity, religion can use rituals and rituals to draw boundaries between people.
While many countries use modern tools and structures, they also rely on traditional religion to maintain their national identity.
Traditional religion, which might have been the solution to humanity's problems, is now part of humanity's problems.
【9】Cultural identity: openness and tolerance
Immigration is an agreement with three clauses
Article 1: The host country allows immigrants to enter.
Pro-immigrationists see this as an obligation.
Anti-immigrants see this as a favor that can be revoked at any time.
Article 2: Immigrants need to accept the core values of the host country.
Pro-immigrants believe in accepting others with tolerance.
Anti-immigrants believe that to maintain tolerance, immigrants must also accept such tolerant values.
Article 3: When immigrants assimilate to a certain extent, the host country will accept them as equal members.
Pro-immigrants believe that newcomers should be accepted quickly.
Anti-immigrants advocate longer probation periods.
In reality, landlord countries usually hold culturalism, and culturalism is not racism.
Part Three: 🌄 Despair and Hope
【10】Terrorism issue #notes
logical conditions for terrorism
Terrorists know that their own power is too small, so they hope that terrorist actions will make their opponents overwhelmed and give them a chance to reshuffle their cards.
Homeland security has become the source of legitimacy for modern countries. In order to protect this legitimacy, the government will respond at all costs. Far more people die in car crashes than in terrorist attacks, but it has nothing to do with legality and gets far less resources and attention.
The terrorist is like a fly that wants to destroy a china shop, but it doesn't have that much power of its own, so it gets into the bull's ear, drives the bull crazy, and then rushes into the china shop.
The right way to deal with terrorism
First, secretly crack down on terrorist organization networks, especially financial networks.
Second, the media must remain objective and avoid hysteria.
Third, the public must curb excessive fear in their hearts and prevent their imaginations from being captured by terrorists.
【11】War issues
The development of the times has made war unprofitable
In ancient times, the main economic assets were land, population, mineral deposits, etc. War plunder was a matter of low damage and low profit.
In modern times, the main economic assets are technology and institutional knowledge, which cannot be plundered by violence. War has become a high-damage, low-profit affair.
You don't get Apple by taking over Silicon Valley.
Nuclear weapons turn wars between major powers into collective suicide, and we cannot expect to obtain sufficient benefits by reshaping the trade and financial system between major powers.
Even if war is unprofitable, do not underestimate human folly and remain humble.
【12】Humility: The earth does not revolve around you
All cultures tend to be self-centered
Taking Judaism as an example to criticize cultural centrism
Argument 1: Judaism has influenced world history by influencing Christianity and Islam, so it is special.
Rebuttal: Freud’s influence was great, but history does not belong to his mother.
Argument 2: Judaism makes a special moral contribution through the Bible.
Refutation: Various civilizations in the world have their own moral traditions, and animals also have their own behavioral norms, showing qualities similar to "caring for the weak".
Argument 3: Monotheism is Judaism’s special contribution to the world.
Refutation: Monotheism has no particular advantages, but is even less inclusive.
Argument 4: Jews have made contributions to science and culture that far exceed their population ratio.
Refutation: The Jewish emphasis on learning may have something to do with this, but this is not the result of Jewish teachings.
【13】God: Don’t take God’s name in vain
We need God as the ultimate interpreter of nature’s mysteries
Refutation: The Big Bang is not a sufficient condition for the existence of a god. Such a god cannot deduce that he has a say in secular rules.
We need God to guide us morally
Rebuttal: The point of morality is to reduce suffering, not to obey a certain commandment. #notes
The behavior of believers determines the value of a god. If the believers are peaceful and friendly, it does not matter which god they believe in or whether they believe in a god.
【14】Secularism: Facing your imperfections
Secularism is not the opposite of belief in God; it has its own positive ideals
Truth: Truth must be based on observation and evidence, not belief alone.
Compassion: The ethics of secularism come not from commandments but from an understanding of suffering, especially the suffering of others.
Equality: Secularism questions all presupposed class systems.
Freedom: Without the freedom to think, investigate and experiment, it is impossible to seek the truth and escape from pain.
Courage: It also takes courage to fight prejudice and oppression, and to admit ignorance, especially the latter.
Responsibility: No matter what you decide to do or not do, you need to take responsibility for yourself.
Secularism acknowledges imperfection and is willing to change various realities. It does not believe that a perfect society can be achieved by adhering to a certain dogma.
Part 4: 🔍 The truth
【15】Ignorance: You know less than you think
The rational individual, the basis of liberalism, is a myth
Behavioral economics and evolutionary psychology have proven that most decisions are not based on rational analysis.
Humans rarely think on an individual basis, but on a group basis.
Power does not help get more truth
The closer you get to the center of power, the more distorted the information becomes.
Looking for revolutionary knowledge at the fringes requires a lot of time, and time is the scarcest resource for powerful people.
【16】Justice: Human Moral Dilemma
Humankind’s sense of justice evolved from ancient times and cannot adapt to the modern world
Cause-and-effect relationships in a globalized world are highly differentiated and complex.
For example, if my pension is invested in a sweatshop, am I responsible?
For example, which hen laid the eggs I eat?
Humans simplify the world to fit their stone brains.
Reduce the size of the problem, such as by thinking of war as a fight between good guys and bad guys.
Focus on personal stories and use personal touching stories to represent the entire event.
Weaving conspiracy theories and substituting fantasy for reality.
Create dogma and leave decision-making power to leaders or institutions that claim to be omniscient.
【17】Post-truth era: Lies will last forever
Even though the complete truth is constantly missing, deception can still be reduced.
Golden rules for personal access to reliable truth #notes
If you want reliable information, you will have to pay a high price
If the question is particularly important, make an effort to read the relevant scientific literature
Human beings rely on fictional stories to establish cooperation, and Homo sapiens is a post-truth species.
power depends on fiction #notes
If you want power, at some point you have to start spreading fictional stories.
If you want the truth, you have to give up the pursuit of power at a certain stage.
【18】The future is not science fiction: the inescapable matrix #notes
The worst problem with modern science fiction is that it confuses consciousness with intelligence
Works that worry about machines becoming intelligent always depict a war between robots and humans.
The real problem is that the human mind can be controlled by technology.
"The Matrix", there is no real world, there is still a matrix outside the matrix.
In "Brave New World", Soma satisfies all desires, and people are unwilling to escape and it is impossible to escape.
Part 5: 🏠 Survive
【19】Educational issues
traditional education #notes
Traditional education is the inheritance of information, but now there is an information glut.
Traditional education teaches people skills, but no one knows what skills will be needed in the future.
Education for the future
Education should teach people to think critically, communicate, cooperate, and be creative to cope with an uncertain future.
People educate themselves ultimately to retain control over themselves in the face of algorithms.
【20】Meaning: Life is not a fictional story
When we ask about the meaning of life, the answer we usually want to hear is a story.
A story that can give meaning to life must meet two conditions #notes
Individuals play a special role in the story.
Nationalism emphasizes the particularity of the country
Communism emphasizes solving particularities
Most religions emphasize the particularity of believers
The story does not have to exhaust the world, but it must extend beyond the personal horizon.
Stories that work don’t need to be true
Any story is wrong because the universe doesn't work in stories.
The wrong story can still run, not by a solid foundation but by the weight of the roof. Because once the story collapses, it can cause personal and social disaster.
Rituals are an important means of making stories real. #notes
Of all rituals, sacrifice is the most powerful. Once we suffer for a story, we are more likely to believe it.
The Story of Liberalism: Through Choices, Individuals Make Meaning for Everything
It’s not the universe that gives me meaning, it’s me that gives meaning to the universe.
But the self may also be a fictional story. There is no real choice.
【21】Re-understanding yourself: the mystery of the human mind
Mind and brain are two issues
The brain is a physical network of neurons, synapses, and biochemical substances
The mind is the flow of subjective experiences of pain, pleasure, love, and anger.
Meditation is not a replacement for brain study, it is an aid to understanding our minds. #notes
The stories get more complex, the algorithms get more sophisticated, and it gets harder and harder to observe yourself.