MindMap Gallery BBC Watch Russia Thousand Years of History of the Iron-Blooded Country
BBC looks at Russia: A mind map of the millennium history of the iron-blooded country. The entire epic seems to convey such a message that is deeply rooted in the heart: the country is in decline, powerful enemies are eyeing it, the frontier is undefeated, and there is no room for slack, so Russia People must share the same hatred and deal with the outside world under the leadership of a centralized government, otherwise the country will be destroyed. This also explains on the one hand the collectivist spirit of Russians that Westerners cannot understand - national interests and collective glory always come first.
Edited at 2023-07-27 15:03:01This is a mind map about bacteria, and its main contents include: overview, morphology, types, structure, reproduction, distribution, application, and expansion. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
This is a mind map about plant asexual reproduction, and its main contents include: concept, spore reproduction, vegetative reproduction, tissue culture, and buds. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
This is a mind map about the reproductive development of animals, and its main contents include: insects, frogs, birds, sexual reproduction, and asexual reproduction. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
This is a mind map about bacteria, and its main contents include: overview, morphology, types, structure, reproduction, distribution, application, and expansion. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
This is a mind map about plant asexual reproduction, and its main contents include: concept, spore reproduction, vegetative reproduction, tissue culture, and buds. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
This is a mind map about the reproductive development of animals, and its main contents include: insects, frogs, birds, sexual reproduction, and asexual reproduction. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
No relevant template
BBC Watch Russia: Thousand Years of History of the Iron-Blooded Country
Kyiv and the prototype of democracy
The entire epic seems to convey such a message that is deeply rooted in the heart: the country is in decline, powerful enemies are eyeing the enemy, the frontier is undefeable, and there is no room for slack, so the Russians must share the same hatred of the enemy and deal with the outside world under the leadership of a centralized government. Otherwise, the country can only perish. This also explains on the one hand the collectivist spirit of Russians that Westerners cannot understand - national interests and collective glory always come first. The Russians can serve the country and kill their enemies regardless of the cost; they can be more aggressive militarily because of the country's weak strength; they can eradicate political opponents in the name of the country without anyone having any objections.
Amid the hidden worries of national subjugation and genocide, the power of autocratic unity is indispensable. After the end of the Mongol rule, absolute monarchy has become the default option
The concept that the Tsar is the spokesperson of God is extremely beneficial to consolidating his rule, so it was vigorously promoted by the Moscow Grand Dukes after Ivan I. Over the centuries, religious belief has become an important means for Russia's authoritarian rulers to stay in power.
The emergence and expansion of the Russian Empire
During the reign of Ivan IV, the power of the nobility was greatly weakened and power was concentrated in the hands of the absolute monarch. In the face of oppression and exploitation, the people can only accept the consequences. The tsar ruled directly over his subjects, with no independent intermediary organizations, no rights, and no rule of law.
In the face of a powerful enemy, common religious beliefs and patriotic sentiments that everyone is responsible for the rise and fall of the country once again tightly united the Russians.
They all agreed that the Tsar should have undisputed and absolute power: an absolute ruler, unchecked by any means, using force to ensure the security of the country. Hundreds of years of autocratic rule could have been dismantled on this once-in-a-lifetime occasion, but the people gave up willingly. Neither the representative government nor individual rights are as important as the unity and stability of the country. This is the idea of the aristocracy and the entire Russian people: democracy and the rule of law are not in line with Russia's national conditions, and autocracy is the right choice.
The Bolsheviks were initially unaware of the use of Susanin's legend to serve their political purposes. They also banned Glinka's opera "Ivan Susanin" for praising the Tsar. But then they discovered that the collectivism promoted in the story was useful for governing, and they began to promote the opera. The final chorus "Ode to Glory" was the predecessor of the Russian national anthem and became a must-sing song for the Soviet Red Army.
Siberia's gold, coal, iron ore and forest resources as well as its rich oil and gas reserves are important guarantees for Russia to become a superpower. However, Elizabeth I's ambassador, Giles Letcher, was not unbiased in his opinion that Siberia's first contribution was furs.
The goal of Peter the Great's reforms was to unify the interests of the people and the country, replace repressive policies with tolerant policies, and turn the hatred in the hearts of the people into blazing patriotic enthusiasm and national identity, so as to restore the hearts and minds of the people.
Peter the Great did not implement democracy. The Russian people can neither change political decisions nor influence the selection of government officials. Decision-making power was still firmly in the hands of the tsar. However, Peter the Great instilled in people the concept that Russia's governance is based on law, fair and reasonable, and related to everyone's vital interests. In fact, this was just a decision made by Peter the Great based on his own interests. It was just that old corruption and abuse of power had brought Russia to the brink of collapse, and reform was urgent.
It is difficult to answer whether Peter the Great was a tyrant or a pioneer of reform. In many ways, he is both: he introduced Western ideas and lifestyles in a very unenlightened way; he highly respected Western values, but ruled as a typical Eastern-style authoritarian dictatorship; he pursued merit rather than Uncivilized, so he opposed the representative system
Archbishop Peter the Great wrote clearly that human beings are naturally selfish and aggressive, so they need an iron fist to curb their natural tendency to fight and control the overall situation. The article writes that the Russians need an autocratic rule system; other systems are not enough to maintain the unity of the country and promote Russia's prosperity and development, so adopting an autocratic system is the best choice. However, some thinkers don't think so. They reiterated the problems that existed during the Kievan Rus' period - the border is too long and difficult to defend; the enemy has been coveting it for a long time - autocracy is the best option amid internal and external troubles. The above ideas continued to influence Russian views on autocracy in the following centuries.
After the Soviet Red Army occupied Germany in 1945, they saw a more open and desirable world, which the Soviet leaders did not want them to see. Likewise, they were impressed by France's freedom and prosperity. After these soldiers returned home, they couldn't help but start to wonder why their country couldn't be like France. Their inner dissatisfaction is fermenting, and their desire for reform is growing stronger. This sentiment quickly infected all Russians, aggravating social conflicts and eventually leading to great social turmoil.
History tells us that the worst governments are those that give people the hope of freedom, the promise of liberation, and then do nothing. If you have never seen a bright world and longed for a happy life, then you can grit your teeth and swallow the unbearable suffering. But the attempt at reform was like a bolt of lightning across the dark night sky, making the people realize that life could still be so wonderful. The most painful thing in the world is not to make people completely despair about life, but to wake up the desperate people, let them experience the freedom of breathing, experience the joy of exchange of ideas, and let them learn to think and judge. Then the previous days without any freedom and without any light, even if they improved, were unbearable in their eyes.
the rise of revolution
Serfdom was once an important economic pillar of Russia, providing Russia with a large number of indentured servants and soldiers, and stabilizing Russia's social structure. This was the reason why the previous tsars were reluctant to abolish serfdom
Although intellectuals glorify farmers and sing praises, few of them have truly experienced the lives of farmers. Tolstoy, Turgenev and even Nekrasov all came from gentry families. For them and the social reformers who followed them, peasants were objects of a cause to which intellectuals devoted themselves, rather than flesh-and-blood individuals who needed to be communicated with and understood. The upper class society that has been baptized by European ideas and the majority of the people who are illiterate are people from two different worlds. The insurmountable gap between them makes it impossible for them to understand each other
Collectivism means that all strata of society have the same spirit, the same faith, the same beliefs, the same values, and the enthusiasm for the public welfare... In the chorus of collectivism, the individual voice is not drowned, but is Find your own resonance in the harmonious singing
When a revolutionary joins the revolution, he has thrown off all the shackles of the civilized world. All laws, morals, and social customs are all nonsense and nonsense... He only knows how to destroy and destroy all the rotten and dirty old order. This is the most reliable and fastest way to revolution. The existing social morality is like dirt in his eyes. What is morality? Anything that helps the victory of the revolution is moral; anything that hinders the progress of the revolution is immoral and heinous.
From 1900 to 1917, Lenin lived incognito abroad and lived on the inheritance left by his mother. He only returned to China once in 1905. He was a professional revolutionary who actually knew very little about the daily lives and suffering of workers. Maxim Gorky said that Lenin had not experienced the life of the working people, so he could not sympathize with the sufferings of the people.
While other parties hesitated, Lenin had boldly promised the people everything they wanted - land, peace, bread and freedom. On the one hand, this means a disregard for legal order and a fatal blow to the crumbling Russian Empire; on the other hand, it greatly enhances the status of the Bolshevik Party in the hearts of the people and lays a mass foundation for its seizure of political leadership.
The Mensheviks' concerns were justified. Almost all those who support the revolution believe that Lenin's "rights belong to the Soviets" means multi-party governance, giving peace and land to the people, and giving workers autonomy. However, the Bolsheviks gradually took over the power and did not want other political parties to participate in political affairs. The first decision after the establishment of the Bolshevik regime was to establish the secret police organization "Cheka" (the Russian abbreviation of "All-Russian Committee for the Suppression of Counterrevolutionaries"). The Cheka launched a nationwide manhunt for all counterrevolutionaries, including former allies such as the Mensheviks
The roaring years
At this critical moment, Lenin took bold action. He issued a decree to confiscate all land without compensation and then distribute the land equally among village communities (the Bolsheviks certainly would not say that this was originally the land policy of the Socialist Revolutionary Party). This land system was unprecedented in Russia and immediately won the support of the Russian people. A large number of peasants defected to the Red Army camp because they were afraid that once the anti-Bolshevik parties came to power, their land would be confiscated again. (In fact, the Bolsheviks' land distribution to the peasants was also temporary. In the 1930s, the peasants' land was taken back.
The resolution "Maintaining Unity within the Party" was officially implemented, which brought serious consequences. Without the different voices of various factions in the party, the Bolshevik Party became a uniform and inert party. No one dared to raise different opinions. No one dared to challenge the authority of the Party Central Committee, because doing so would be labeled as "engaging in sectarian activities" (Stalin later used false accusations to suppress other colleagues and monopolize power.) This resolution became a landmark for more than 70 years. The party’s dictatorship paves the way
The leaders of the Russian Communists have always believed that reforming, educating, and perfecting mankind is their sacred mission. The Communist Party will lead us from the dark, corrupt and degenerate real world into a pure, harmonious, and beautiful future. However, the prerequisite for achieving this goal is that the people must unconditionally obey the party's leadership, and those who disobey will be mercilessly punished.
During the five-year power struggle after Lenin's death, Stalin took control of the government's archives and administrative departments and placed his cronies in important positions one by one. Stalin was well aware of the faults or minor shortcomings of political opponents and then discredited them. Gradually, power came into the hands of Stalin and his minions. Intra-party democracy exists in name only
The most crucial factor in the Bolshevik Party's rapid rise to power in 1917 was its promise to allocate land to peasants. This promise won popular support for the new regime. But the Communist Party has never thought of permanently distributing land to the people
Collectivization was initially welcomed enthusiastically by the impoverished peasants - they had nothing to lose and the new tractors that appeared on state farms were attractive. But it is too early to predict the victory of collectivization: resistance to the collective farms is growing, not only from the "lackeys of capitalism" but also from millions of ordinary farmers and men and women who have made their fortunes through hard work. For example, Martha and her family did not want their belongings to be taken away by the government without any reason.
Many peasants viewed collectivization as a reappearance of serfdom. Not only did they have to give up their rights to land and property, they also had no right to sell their own things. Now they are forced to sell grain to the state at low prices at prices set by the state. During the Tsarist rule, the government tied farmers to the land through the household registration system and prohibited them from going out to work.
Ordinary "good people" gloated as they watched the kulaks around them being knocked down one by one, but they also knew that anyone who opposed collectivization or showed a hint of dissatisfaction would be classified as a kulaks and accept the same fate.
Stalin's campaign to "annihilate the kulaks" was expanded, resulting in countless unjust, false and wrongful convictions. Since the distinction between poor peasants and rich peasants was not clear-cut, any peasant with some wealth, anyone who opposed collectivization, and even those whom local cadres disliked were classified as rich peasants and were subject to criticism. Thousands of people were executed, and millions were exiled to the desolate landscapes of Siberia and Central Asia, left to fend for themselves.
The Soviet government was unaware of the sabotage activities of the reactionaries simply because these sabotage activities did not exist at all. The most likely reasons for failure to meet production targets are outdated equipment and backward technology. But the Soviet government would not accept such an excuse. They wanted to find scapegoats for the economic downturn and punished the so-called "saboteurs" in a high-profile manner to encourage others to work harder.
The collective dormitories in the Soviet Union reflected the abandonment of private property and the concept of the nuclear family. It is not a good thing for many people to live under the same roof: quarrels and quarrels between residents are common, and some even have deep grudges; thefts continue, and murders occur from time to time; there are too many people who make secret reports, making people panic; Mutual suspicion and disputes break out; workers in large factories sometimes have to live in tents
In 1932, in order to better control population mobility, the Soviet Union established a household registration system to register citizens' ethnicity, occupation and social status in detail. The introduction of the household registration system made it impossible for people to change their place of residence at will, and they could not move to big cities like Moscow or Petrograd as they pleased. While the people of the Soviet Union were struggling in dire straits, the powerful people relied on their privileges to own houses and cars, and lived a life of fine clothing and food. The huge gap between rich and poor has made class contradictions increasingly acute. Stalin's industrialization movement sought economic growth at the expense of the interests of the broad masses of the people. While people praise economic progress, they cannot help but suppress raging anger in their hearts.
Stalin responded that being captured was a crime, and even if he escaped by chance, he would be punished. Families of captured Soviet servicemen were immediately deprived of military rations. In Stalin’s view, “There are no prisoners of war in the Soviet Union, only traitors.”
For Stalin, however, the defection of some Red Army prisoners tainted them all. In his black and white thinking, every prisoner of war who returns home may be an enemy. The NKVD established screening camps to examine the circumstances of returning prisoners of war and why they did not fight to the death like true patriots. no one is trusted
In some quarters, veterans were seen as a threat to the Soviet regime. The men's shared experiences created a strong emotional bond between them that the Kremlin feared would override their loyalty to the country. They prohibit the establishment of veterans' organizations and actively prevent veterans from participating in public life, expressing opinions or publishing memoirs
But as well as fear, love can also be used to inspire people to self-sacrifice. The Kremlin is adept at drawing what it needs from the Russian tradition of patriotism. The war was given the official name "Patriotic War" to evoke the memory of the "Patriotic War" of 1812 against Napoleon. New military honors named after heroic figures in history were constantly created - the Suvorov Medal, the Kutuzov Medal and the Nevsky Medal, and golden tassels reappeared on military uniforms.
The political uncertainty following Stalin's death left prison authorities at a loss as to what to do. “They had no idea what to do,” Solzhenitsyn wrote, “and it was dangerous to make mistakes. If they reacted too violently and killed a group of people, they might end up being punished as Beria’s minions. On the other hand, if they had not reacted vigorously enough and actively forced the prisoners to work - the result would have been exactly the same as the previous situation!
Years of propaganda and misinformation have confused people, and they no longer know the difference between truth and lies. Despite protests, Khrushchev's speech won him considerable support. Party and government officials at the grassroots and middle levels were still young and did not bear direct culpability for the Stalinist period, so they were all elated that repressive rule and "cult of personality" were being replaced by "collective leadership" and "socialist rule of law." They want to ensure that past lawlessness and indiscipline are not repeated and that democratization can be achieved in the future. Forty years later, Mikhail Gorbachev organized a conference to commemorate the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. At the meeting, he praised Khrushchev’s “political courage” and marveled at the “huge political risks” he had taken
The stormy road to reform
Khrushchev's competitiveness was ridiculed by many. A popular joke goes like this: Eisenhower responded to Khrushchev's taunt by suggesting that the two race to see who could "catch up" with the other. When the athlete Eisenhower easily won the competition, the Soviet media had to use their cleverness to cover up this fact - "Pravda" reported: "Our leader Khrushchev achieved second place in the world-class competition. The President of the United States is disgracefully ranked second from the bottom
When you open the newspaper or turn on the television, do you yourself really believe what you hear, even for a moment? No, I'm pretty sure you yourselves stopped believing it a long time ago. If you don't believe it anymore, then you have no idea what life is really like in this country. "The Soviets tried to solve the world's problems, but their own country was in disarray."
When his reform policies encountered resistance from the privileged classes within the party, he bypassed these people and expressed his demands directly to the public. Disclosure of policies allows the public to know some information they need to know, such as that the measures he takes are beneficial. At the same time, he denounced those who opposed the "reconstruction" plan. The purpose of Gorbachev's move was to mobilize the whole society to support the modernization reforms of the economy and organizational structure. What is surprising is that people actually used their new empowerment to demand more radical and faster reforms.
He was so distressed by the opposition within his party—a group of people who talked the talk but walked the walk—that he tried to work around the resistance. He said at the 27th Party Congress: "Increasing information disclosure is an important measure. This is a political issue. Openness will bring democratic awareness and political innovation to the people and encourage them to participate in national construction. "Gorbachev knew his purpose in doing this: to arouse public opinion in order to break down resistance to reforms within the party. What he didn't expect was that once freedom of speech is liberalized, it will be difficult to control it.
Russia demands to join the European Union, the World Trade Organization, and even NATO. However, all requests were flatly rejected. NATO continued to expand its presence among the former Soviet satellite states in Eastern Europe, including Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. Moscow became alarmed, fearing that Soviet republics such as Ukraine, Georgia and the Baltic states would also be admitted
Putin accomplished all his goals, and the vast majority of the Russian people are grateful to him. But Putin's critics complain that his success has come at the expense of democracy. During his administration, the functions of the parliament were weakened and the powers of the president were strengthened; the leaders of Russia's 89 federal subjects were no longer determined through elections but were appointed by the Kremlin
Putin's crackdown on oligarchs has also boosted his approval ratings. These business tycoons control Russian industry and continue to exert influence on the government behind the scenes. Most Russian people despise them. So when Putin announced his plan to “liquidate the oligarchs,” there was widespread applause
Putin summoned several important oligarchs to the Kremlin and reexplained the rules of the game and their roles to them. Putin said he would not interfere with their business activities or reverse the privatization process as long as they agreed to stay out of politics. These people owe their wealth accumulation to privatization. They cannot fund political parties, cannot pursue personal political power, but most importantly, cannot question or criticize the president
Liberals in the West and Russia strongly condemned this abuse of the judicial system. But to be honest, for the sake of Russia, Putin does need to regain control of oil resources. Soaring energy prices have largely consolidated Putin's authority: Russia's economy has shaken off its sluggish state and begun to prosper; Moscow has once again demonstrated its strength on the international stage and returned to the ranks of world powers.
When Vladimir Putin chose to seize the assets of the oil company Yukos and jail the owners, he drew criticism from London, Berlin and Washington. Commentators predict that Western money will flee authoritarian rule. The bankruptcy of Yukos and the two convictions of Khodorkovsky were a deliberate backlash against “Western values,” but Western investors still poured into Russia hoping for a quick profit. BP signs multi-billion dollar deal with Rosneft. International trade does not seem to have persuaded Russia to behave the way European countries do, but rather allowed it to continue to do its own thing
Russia adopts a low single tax rate of 13% to encourage people to pay taxes on time and not to evade taxes, thus increasing the country's tax revenue. However, problems remain. Although the average income level has increased compared with the past, the gap between the poor and the rich continues to widen. The economy has always relied on the export of crude oil. The government does not pay attention to increasing or improving the productivity of other industries, especially agriculture, and productivity has been low for a long time.
When the liberal experiment ended in the 1990s, new problems arose. At this time, the return of iron-fisted rule was achieved with the support of the people, rather than being imposed on them. The Putin government and the Putin-Medvedev government are really, really popular. Few people in Russia want a return to the Yeltsin era; Russia's liberals have almost no influence and no followers