Navigating the Complexities of International Law: Principles of Intervention
MindMap Gallery
Navigating the Complexities of International Law: Principles of Intervention
33
Release time：2021-10-16
Navigating the Complexities of International Law: Principles of Intervention
"Delve into the intricate legalities of the principle of intervention under international law. This comprehensive analysis examines case studies and articles defining the boundaries and repercussions of external influence in sovereign matters, including financial contributions and the spread of misinformation. Understand the delicate balance between the right to self-determination and the prohibition of intervention in internal affairs, as delineated by international conventions and case law."
UN Charter: Article 2 (4) All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, article 41
“tension between the duty of a diplomat under Article 41 of the Vienna Convention,not to interfere in the internal affairs of the receiving State and the opinion of liberal States that human rights are a matter of legitimate international concern whose active promotion is a major part of their foreign policy”
Violate international law
The principle of Intervnetion
(a) Interference in political activities (such as through financial or other support for particular political parties or candidates, or even perhaps comment on upcoming elections or on the candidates;
(b) Support for secession;
(c) Seeking to overthrow the government so-called ‘regime change’, especially in the case of ‘rogue States’ It has occasionally been suggested that intervention in order to restore (or establish) democracy is permitted under international law “[S]uch a proposition is not acceptable in international law
Problem after Referadum (fundamental human right was violated by Ravaria)
Ravarian agents have engaged
in coercive and illegal intervention in our domestic affairs.
The disinformation campaign that was carried on during the run-up to the recent referendum was a deliberate effort by a foreign power to interfere with an election on our territory.
The result was a pre-planned and orchestrated denial of the right of our citizens to exercise free political choice.
Dissemination of Misinformation => influence to outcom of Sutha Referemdum
Article 1:
1. All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development. (International Convenant on Civil and Political right)
Volate international law
Lisa Case between Rassia and Germany
Ravaria’s campaign of financial contributions and the dissemination of
misinformation intending to influence the outcome of the Suthan referendum were in violation of international law
Ravaria’s campaign of financial contributions
Ravaria's campaign of the dissemination of
misinformation
Ravarian had formulated a plan marked ''TOP SECRET" for the initiation of a propaganda campaign to persuade citizens of Sutha, once separated from Sntara, to ''join the Velan Kingdom of Ravaria''
Plan was to promote the candidacy of Prof. Liam Hunland to become president of the independent Suthan State.
intending to influence the outcome of the Suthan referendum
Ravaria need the Sutha sucession from Anatara to be an indepence state.
violation of international law
Treaty
Singapore Treay (Between Antara vs Ravaria)
UN Charter
ICCPR
ICESCR
VCDR
Customary International law
Article on State Responsibility
General Principle
judicial decision, Teaching of the most qualify publicist of the various nation
Wondershare EdrawMind
EdrawMind